Teams

Harrison (Judith Humphries)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 55 & Over Women · 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-18vs Harrison TC (Susan Levent)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesJudith Humphries / Carol Pedersen vs Susan Korak / Sumie Thrasher5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJean Desvernine / Diane Williams vs Linda McMullen / Janet Stewart7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSarah Thackston / Karen Jensen vs Melissa Cooper / Lianne Driver6-4, 6-1
2026-02-12vs Hunter Park (Lisa Hogan)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Presto / Judith Humphries vs Sherri Hintz / Patricia Martin3-6, 7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiane Scholz / Karen Jensen vs Melinda Davis / Velida Turner6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Williams / Cheryl Breslin vs Cathy Spivey / Janis Aydelette7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-10vs Harrison TC (Susan Levent)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Hill / Cheryl Breslin vs Sandy Goldstein / Sumie Thrasher6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarol Pedersen / Judith Humphries vs Susan Korak / Susie Verscharen6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJean Desvernine / Sarah Thackston vs Deanna Carlson / Debra Smith6-2, 6-2
2026-01-28vs Harrison TC (Elise Bishop)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Scholz / Cindy Presto vs Susie Dufresne / Christine Brown6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Pedersen / Cheryl Breslin vs Tammy Preusse / Babs Baldwin6-2, 0-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Jensen / Sarah Thackston vs Lorie White / Janice Jenkins6-4, 6-0
2026-01-21vs Harrison TC (Cindy Brizendine)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Scholz / Lisa Hill vs Janet Springfield / Debra Wright6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarol Pedersen / Cindy Presto vs Martha Battle / Patricia McClure6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Jensen / Diane Williams vs Melody Tosi / Christina Reeder6-1, 6-4
2026-01-14vs Hunter Park (Pamela Cole)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Hill / Diane Scholz vs Pamela Cole / Carole Pittman7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCindy Presto / Judith Humphries vs Jamie Chastain / Sheryl Joyce6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Harrison (Judith Humphries)*601539149
2USTA Atlanta/Zarrin Hagan5114410131
3Atlanta CC (Judi West)*5112614152
4Wexford (Leigh Hebbe)*4212613154
5Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)*4212614161
6TPC Sugarloaf (Sandy Elliott)*4213514149
7Harrison TC (Elise Bishop)*4211718183
8Hunter Park (Pamela Cole)*4210818166
9USTA Atlanta/Debra Shannon429920192
10USTA Atlanta/Deborah Wilson3311718165
11Sugar Creek (Carolyn Wilson)*3310819176
12Hudlow TC (Kathy Lewis)*3310820183
13Hunter Park (Lisa Hogan)*249921190
14Harrison (Leona Zivitz)*2481023192
15Southland (Lynette Wilson-Phillips)*2461225203
16Mayfair/St Clair (Dawn Lockwood)*2461227217
17Vickery (Lynn Alexander)*2451328205
18Harrison TC (Susan Levent)*1561226206
19River Club (Anne Carter)*1551328201
20Harrison TC (Cindy Brizendine)*1531530219
21Princeton Square (Karen Allen)*1551330214
22Sentinel Lake (Kim Griffin)*1541431226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Cheryl Breslin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Diane Scholz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Cindy Presto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Judith Humphries
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Jean Desvernine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Sarah Thackston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Carol Pedersen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Diane Williams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Karen Jensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Williams + Sarah Thackston8457% games+11.4% vs expected
Diane Scholz + Cindy Presto5256% games+8.1% vs expected
Carol Pedersen + Cheryl Breslin7554% games+7.1% vs expected
Diane Scholz + Cheryl Breslin9162% games+5.5% vs expected
Carol Pedersen + Diane Scholz5256% games+5.2% vs expected
Carol Pedersen + Diane Williams4353% games+5.1% vs expected
Carol Pedersen + Judith Humphries333550% games+2.1% vs expected
Judith Humphries + Cindy Presto473453% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Breslin
54W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Diane Scholz
71W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Cindy Presto
90W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Judith Humphries
127W–114L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Jean Desvernine
31W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Sarah Thackston
51W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Carol Pedersen
78W–88L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Diane Williams
59W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.88
Karen Jensen
12W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.