Teams

Mayfair/St Clair (Dawn Lockwood)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 55 & Over Women · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-18vs Hudlow TC (Kathy Lewis)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesKathryn Bergquist / Ann Paek vs Susan Dignan / Phyllis Grimes6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTerrie Howard / Dawn Lockwood vs Kathy Lewis / Theresa ODonnell6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSue Wiggin / Nicolina Devito vs Bonnie Ferguson / Betsy Edwards4-6, 1-6
2026-02-16vs Hedgerows (Wanda Loggins)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDawn Lockwood / Kathryn Bergquist vs Suzy Mercker / Julie Turner2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTerrie Howard / Christine McHenry vs Linda Werren / Karen Sullivan4-6, 6-3, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSue Wiggin / Ann Paek vs Dana Anderson / Kathy Mayhew2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-02-10vs TPC Sugarloaf (Sandy Elliott)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Paek / Christine McHenry vs Anne Holtzclaw / Prisca Lynch6-3, 1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Przybylinski / Susan Bailey vs Karen Peel / Ellen Tarulli7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNicolina Devito / Sue Wiggin vs Joyce Larkins / Peggy Pfohl6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-01-30vs Hudlow TC (Kathy Lewis)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDawn Lockwood / Ann Paek vs Phyllis Grimes / Susan Dignan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Przybylinski / Susan Bailey vs Deborah Hammond / Theresa ODonnell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Bell / Nicolina Devito vs Becky Seay / Marlene Holben6-7, 1-6
2026-01-21vs Hedgerows (Wanda Loggins)*Split 11
W#1 DoublesDawn Lockwood / Ann Paek vs Linda Werren / Teresa Pierce2-6, 7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Bailey / Michele Przybylinski vs Julie Turner / Suzy Mercker2-6, 6-4, 2-6
2026-01-14vs TPC Sugarloaf (Sandy Elliott)*Split 11
L#1 DoublesDawn Lockwood / Michele Przybylinski vs Patricia Haywood / Prisca Lynch2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNicolina Devito / Christine McHenry vs Sandy Elliott / Meylin Gonzalez7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Harrison (Judith Humphries)*601539149
2USTA Atlanta/Zarrin Hagan5114410131
3Atlanta CC (Judi West)*5112614152
4Wexford (Leigh Hebbe)*4212613154
5Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)*4212614161
6TPC Sugarloaf (Sandy Elliott)*4213514149
7Harrison TC (Elise Bishop)*4211718183
8Hunter Park (Pamela Cole)*4210818166
9USTA Atlanta/Debra Shannon429920192
10USTA Atlanta/Deborah Wilson3311718165
11Sugar Creek (Carolyn Wilson)*3310819176
12Hudlow TC (Kathy Lewis)*3310820183
13Hunter Park (Lisa Hogan)*249921190
14Harrison (Leona Zivitz)*2481023192
15Southland (Lynette Wilson-Phillips)*2461225203
16Mayfair/St Clair (Dawn Lockwood)*2461227217
17Vickery (Lynn Alexander)*2451328205
18Harrison TC (Susan Levent)*1561226206
19River Club (Anne Carter)*1551328201
20Harrison TC (Cindy Brizendine)*1531530219
21Princeton Square (Karen Allen)*1551330214
22Sentinel Lake (Kim Griffin)*1541431226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Kathryn Bergquist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Ann Paek
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Dawn Lockwood
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Terrie Howard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Michele Przybylinski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Nicolina Devito
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Christine McHenry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Sue Wiggin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Linda Bell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Lylian Voss
published
Paula Stezzi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Bergquist + Ann Paek7161% games+7.3% vs expected
Dawn Lockwood + Ann Paek3547% games−1.2% vs expected
Paula Stezzi + Linda Bell121644% games−4.0% vs expected
Michele Przybylinski + Dawn Lockwood1442% gamesnot enough data
Terrie Howard + Dawn Lockwood3248% gamesnot enough data
Linda Bell + Dawn Lockwood134 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Lockwood + Lylian Voss134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Bergquist
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Ann Paek
18W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Dawn Lockwood
24W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
Terrie Howard
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Michele Przybylinski
37W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Nicolina Devito
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96
3
Christine McHenry
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Sue Wiggin
4W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
Linda Bell
45W–71L career · 1 line in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.78
Lylian Voss
7W–27L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Paula Stezzi
27W–40L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.