Teams

USTA Atlanta/Zarrin Hagan

USTA Atlanta Winter - 55 & Over Women · 3.5

8 players · average NTRP / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-18vs Vickery (Lynn Alexander)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Collins / Lisa Heffner vs Kim Erickson / Lisa Komanski6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTerry Kapper / Sally Caudle vs Libby Curry / Janice Leitch7-5, 6-1
2026-02-16vs Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesZarrin Hagan / Lisa Heffner vs Claudine Lefrancois / Claudette Stephen6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLesli Greenberg Notte / Sharie Rhea vs Theresa McGowan / Sherrill Kirch4-6, 6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Collins / Sally Caudle vs Donna Avil / Bernadette Graham6-2, 4-6, 6-4
2026-02-12vs Princeton Square (Karen Allen)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesLesli Greenberg Notte / Terry Kapper vs Julie Todd / Shelia Burns6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesZarrin Hagan / Lisa Heffner vs Karen Allen Smith / Becky Kennedy6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSally Caudle / Donna Kizer vs Katie Jones / Alice Cotter7-5, 6-2
2026-01-29vs Vickery (Lynn Alexander)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesTerry Kapper / Lesli Greenberg Notte vs Janice Leitch / Lisa Komanski6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesZarrin Hagan / Lisa Heffner vs Barbara Gauthier / Linda Douglas6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSally Caudle / Donna Kizer vs Vickie Quinn / Lynn Alexander6-1, 6-0
2026-01-21vs Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLesli Greenberg Notte / Sharie Rhea vs Claudine Lefrancois / Claudette Stephen6-2, 4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Collins / Terry Kapper vs Rachel Simes / Carolyn Haarer1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDonna Kizer / Zarrin Hagan vs Bernadette Graham / Donna McCarthy2-6, 4-6
2026-01-14vs Princeton Square (Karen Allen)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesZarrin Hagan / Lesli Greenberg Notte vs Shelia Burns / Julie Todd5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Collins / Lisa Heffner vs Alice Cotter / Margaret Norman6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSally Caudle / Donna Kizer vs Dianne Miller / Susan Zimmerman7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Harrison (Judith Humphries)*601539149
2USTA Atlanta/Zarrin Hagan5114410131
3Atlanta CC (Judi West)*5112614152
4Wexford (Leigh Hebbe)*4212613154
5Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)*4212614161
6TPC Sugarloaf (Sandy Elliott)*4213514149
7Harrison TC (Elise Bishop)*4211718183
8Hunter Park (Pamela Cole)*4210818166
9USTA Atlanta/Debra Shannon429920192
10USTA Atlanta/Deborah Wilson3311718165
11Sugar Creek (Carolyn Wilson)*3310819176
12Hudlow TC (Kathy Lewis)*3310820183
13Hunter Park (Lisa Hogan)*249921190
14Harrison (Leona Zivitz)*2481023192
15Southland (Lynette Wilson-Phillips)*2461225203
16Mayfair/St Clair (Dawn Lockwood)*2461227217
17Vickery (Lynn Alexander)*2451328205
18Harrison TC (Susan Levent)*1561226206
19River Club (Anne Carter)*1551328201
20Harrison TC (Cindy Brizendine)*1531530219
21Princeton Square (Karen Allen)*1551330214
22Sentinel Lake (Kim Griffin)*1541431226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Sally Caudle
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.36
Lisa Heffner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.35
Lesli Greenberg Notte
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.28
Zarrin Hagan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Sharie Rhea
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Terry Kapper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Lisa Collins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Donna Kizer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Heffner + Zarrin Hagan5358% games+7.7% vs expected
Lisa Heffner + Sally Caudle6361% games+2.6% vs expected
Sally Caudle + Terry Kapper4160% games+2.0% vs expected
Sharie Rhea + Lesli Greenberg Notte4548% games+1.5% vs expected
Donna Kizer + Sharie Rhea5060% games−0.0% vs expected
Sally Caudle + Sharie Rhea10656% games−0.4% vs expected
Donna Kizer + Sally Caudle6068% gamesnot enough data
Sharie Rhea + Zarrin Hagan3348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sally Caudle
36W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Lisa Heffner
57W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Lesli Greenberg Notte
9W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Zarrin Hagan
29W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Sharie Rhea
30W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Terry Kapper
21W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Lisa Collins
11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Donna Kizer
23W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.