Teams

Harrison (Leona Zivitz)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 55 & Over Women · 3.5

10 players · average NTRP / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesGloria Beauchene / Pamela McNeill vs Kimberly Laidhold / Sandy Roberts3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKris Shubert / Lauren Ziller vs Patty Herndon / Connie Austin2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Hanks / Kelley Hamilton vs Karen Vaglia / Jill Price7-5, 7-5
2026-02-16vs Wexford (Leigh Hebbe)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Ziller / Pamela McNeill vs Lourdes Bove / Beverly Patteson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLeona Zivitz / Gloria Beauchene vs Deborah Lantz / Lori Nolan5-5
W#3 DoublesKris Shubert / Helena Trotter vs Anne Barnett / Joan Garrett6-4, 6-3
2026-02-13vs River Club (Anne Carter)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesPamela McNeill / Kelley Hamilton vs Anne Carter / Sue McConnell7-5, 1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKris Shubert / Helena Trotter vs Dory Bernard / Clare Coyne6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLauren Ziller / Leona Zivitz vs Ruth Dayman / Georgeta Chitu6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2026-02-09vs Atlanta CC (Judi West)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKelley Hamilton / Kathy Hanks vs Sterling Edison / Nancy Kepano3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRose Carter / Gayle Ellis vs Grace Trent / Sherri Calcagno4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGloria Beauchene / Lauren Ziller vs Wendy Brock / Joan Skesavage6-3, 6-1
2026-01-21vs Sentinel Lake (Kim Griffin)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesKathy Hanks / Pamela McNeill vs Kim Griffin / Jill Welch3-6, 6-4, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRose Carter / Kris Shubert vs Maureen Griffin / Anna Carzoli2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGloria Beauchene / Leona Zivitz vs Dawn Hawkins / Pamela Miller6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesKathy Hanks / Kelley Hamilton vs Laura Winkler / Sandy Roberts2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGloria Beauchene / Pamela McNeill vs Yvonne Krauter / Patty Herndon3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGayle Ellis / Helena Trotter vs Barbara Gradolf / Jill Price6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Harrison (Judith Humphries)*601539149
2USTA Atlanta/Zarrin Hagan5114410131
3Atlanta CC (Judi West)*5112614152
4Wexford (Leigh Hebbe)*4212613154
5Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)*4212614161
6TPC Sugarloaf (Sandy Elliott)*4213514149
7Harrison TC (Elise Bishop)*4211718183
8Hunter Park (Pamela Cole)*4210818166
9USTA Atlanta/Debra Shannon429920192
10USTA Atlanta/Deborah Wilson3311718165
11Sugar Creek (Carolyn Wilson)*3310819176
12Hudlow TC (Kathy Lewis)*3310820183
13Hunter Park (Lisa Hogan)*249921190
14Harrison (Leona Zivitz)*2481023192
15Southland (Lynette Wilson-Phillips)*2461225203
16Mayfair/St Clair (Dawn Lockwood)*2461227217
17Vickery (Lynn Alexander)*2451328205
18Harrison TC (Susan Levent)*1561226206
19River Club (Anne Carter)*1551328201
20Harrison TC (Cindy Brizendine)*1531530219
21Princeton Square (Karen Allen)*1551330214
22Sentinel Lake (Kim Griffin)*1541431226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Kelley Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Kathy Hanks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Pamela McNeill
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.21
Rose Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Gayle Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Gloria Beauchene
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Lauren Ziller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Helena Trotter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Kris Shubert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Leona Zivitz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kris Shubert + Gloria Beauchene4355% games+10.3% vs expected
Lauren Ziller + Kris Shubert61049% games+8.4% vs expected
Helena Trotter + Kris Shubert2447% games+7.0% vs expected
Kathy Hanks + Kelley Hamilton261853% games+4.2% vs expected
Lauren Ziller + Helena Trotter5355% games+4.0% vs expected
Pamela McNeill + Gloria Beauchene302156% games+2.4% vs expected
Gayle Ellis + Gloria Beauchene2749% games+2.0% vs expected
Pamela McNeill + Kelley Hamilton4352% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelley Hamilton
49W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Kathy Hanks
48W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Pamela McNeill
76W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Rose Carter
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Gayle Ellis
41W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Gloria Beauchene
64W–65L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Lauren Ziller
28W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Helena Trotter
31W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
3.08
Kris Shubert
60W–100L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Leona Zivitz
42W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.