Teams

Princeton Square (Karen Allen)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 55 & Over Women · 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-18vs Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesShelia Burns / Alice Cotter vs Sherrill Kirch / Carolyn Haarer3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Meyers / Karen Allen Smith vs Rachel Noel / Theresa McGowan3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBecky Kennedy / Dianne Miller vs Donna Avil / Bernadette Graham0-6, 6-7
2026-02-16vs Vickery (Lynn Alexander)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesShelia Burns / Julie Todd vs Kim Erickson / Lisa Komanski3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKaren Allen Smith / Cathy Meyers vs Janice Leitch / Jessica Marro3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Norman / Dianne Miller vs Elizabeth Hardin / Kathleen Petro2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-02-12vs USTA Atlanta/Zarrin HaganLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Todd / Shelia Burns vs Lesli Greenberg Notte / Terry Kapper1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Allen Smith / Becky Kennedy vs Zarrin Hagan / Lisa Heffner2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Jones / Alice Cotter vs Sally Caudle / Donna Kizer5-7, 2-6
2026-01-28vs Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesShelia Burns / Julie Todd vs Claudine Lefrancois / Claudette Stephen4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Meyers / Margaret Norman vs Sherrill Kirch / Carolyn Haarer7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatie Jones / Dianne Miller vs Donna Avil / Karen Reynolds4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-01-21vs Vickery (Lynn Alexander)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Allen Smith / Cathy Meyers vs Janice Leitch / Jessica Marro6-4, 0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesShelia Burns / Becky Kennedy vs Kim Erickson / Lisa Komanski3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Zimmerman / Caroline Egan vs Barbara Gauthier / Beverly Bishop3-2
2026-01-14vs USTA Atlanta/Zarrin HaganLost 12
W#1 DoublesShelia Burns / Julie Todd vs Zarrin Hagan / Lesli Greenberg Notte5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlice Cotter / Margaret Norman vs Lisa Collins / Lisa Heffner0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDianne Miller / Susan Zimmerman vs Sally Caudle / Donna Kizer5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Harrison (Judith Humphries)*601539149
2USTA Atlanta/Zarrin Hagan5114410131
3Atlanta CC (Judi West)*5112614152
4Wexford (Leigh Hebbe)*4212613154
5Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)*4212614161
6TPC Sugarloaf (Sandy Elliott)*4213514149
7Harrison TC (Elise Bishop)*4211718183
8Hunter Park (Pamela Cole)*4210818166
9USTA Atlanta/Debra Shannon429920192
10USTA Atlanta/Deborah Wilson3311718165
11Sugar Creek (Carolyn Wilson)*3310819176
12Hudlow TC (Kathy Lewis)*3310820183
13Hunter Park (Lisa Hogan)*249921190
14Harrison (Leona Zivitz)*2481023192
15Southland (Lynette Wilson-Phillips)*2461225203
16Mayfair/St Clair (Dawn Lockwood)*2461227217
17Vickery (Lynn Alexander)*2451328205
18Harrison TC (Susan Levent)*1561226206
19River Club (Anne Carter)*1551328201
20Harrison TC (Cindy Brizendine)*1531530219
21Princeton Square (Karen Allen)*1551330214
22Sentinel Lake (Kim Griffin)*1541431226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Cathy Meyers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Margaret Norman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Julie Todd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Shelia Burns
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.99
Dianne Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Alice Cotter
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.75
Karen Allen Smith
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Becky Kennedy
published 3
Caroline Egan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Susan Zimmerman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelia Burns + Julie Todd134 matchesnot enough data
Karen Allen Smith + Cathy Meyers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathy Meyers
4W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Margaret Norman
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Julie Todd
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
Shelia Burns
1W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Dianne Miller
2W–10L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
Alice Cotter
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
Karen Allen Smith
20W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.75
3
Becky Kennedy
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Caroline Egan
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Susan Zimmerman
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.