Teams

Cervezas & Aces 40+

2026 USTA MIXED 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Leftovers Reheated8122516183
2Cervezas & Aces 40+8121618201
3Ace & Grace7218922212
4No Mercy72161126208
5MSA 7.0 (Mas Serve Aces)45111638271
6Net Flicks27111634254
7Ballz for Dayz1862144295
8Mixed Bag of Tricks1852244309

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Paula Lawson
published 4
3.54
Andrew Bidou
published 3.5
3.52
Jason Steele
published 3.5
3.48
Ira Fagin
published 3.5
3.45
Jae Yu
published 3.5
3.45
Margie Waddel
published 3.5
3.39
James Mertz
published 3.5
3.38
Zel Mertz
published 3.5
3.34
Heidi Hawkins
published 3.5
3.31
Leann Gilberg
published 3.5
3.24
Marnie Newton
published 3.5
3.21
Nate Espinola
published 3.5
3.13
Shawna Byington
published 3.5
2.97
Ralph Rico
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nate Espinola + Heidi Hawkins8264% games+13.0% vs expected
Zel Mertz + James Mertz271058% games+0.1% vs expected
Leann Gilberg + Jason Steele111052% games−5.7% vs expected
Nate Espinola + Shawna Byington4451% games−8.8% vs expected
Shawna Byington + Jae Yu10263% gamesnot enough data
Leann Gilberg + Nate Espinola5352% gamesnot enough data
Leann Gilberg + Jae Yu6165% gamesnot enough data
Paula Lawson + James Mertz2445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Paula Lawson
203W–118L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
3.5
Andrew Bidou
106W–61L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Jason Steele
134W–112L career · no lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Ira Fagin
71W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Jae Yu
156W–95L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Margie Waddel
110W–126L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
James Mertz
187W–123L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Zel Mertz
310W–181L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Heidi Hawkins
142W–130L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Leann Gilberg
124W–186L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Marnie Newton
214W–184L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Nate Espinola
77W–122L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Shawna Byington
207W–193L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Ralph Rico
39W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.