Teams

MISSION RANCH 55AW9.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 9.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-24vs SEASCAPE SC 55AW9.0ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Gregorius / Lauren Lyssy Haase vs Aoife Wilson / Amy Clark6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStephanie Scattini / Linda Scholink vs Roxanne Harrison / Ann King2-6, 3-6
2025-05-17vs SEASCAPE SC 55AW9.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea Bohn Eisinger / Suzanne Andrews vs Jodi Andrews / Vivian Gunnerengen7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristine Fleige / Laura Ravalin vs Wendi Eckardt / Robin Balowitz2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrenda Berke / Mary Gregorius vs Lena Wikner / Mari Anderson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-10vs SEASCAPE SC 55AW9.0ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesLauren Lyssy Haase / Leslie Tracy vs Wendi Eckardt / Laura Towle6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Ajeska / Helen Potter vs Kim Halvorsen / Lena Wikner6-7, 4-6
2025-05-04vs SEASCAPE SC 55AW9.0ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Andrews / Leslie Tracy vs Robin Balowitz / Lena Wikner4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLynn Holt / Gena Sagin vs Kim Halvorsen / Vivian Gunnerengen7-6, 6-1
2025-04-26vs SEASCAPE SC 55AW9.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Andrews / Kathleen Chassion vs Robin Balowitz / Wendi Eckardt6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndrea Bohn Eisinger / Lauren Lyssy Haase vs Ann King / Lena Wikner6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Ajeska / Kathrin Brown vs Chizuko Heney / Mari Anderson6-4, 7-5
2025-04-19vs SEASCAPE SC 55AW9.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Chassion / Lynne Johnson vs Robin Balowitz / Wendi Eckardt6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Gregorius / Margaret Hudson vs Lisa Tripp / Roxanne Harrison7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrenda Berke / Christine Fleige vs Mari Anderson / Ann King6-1, 6-3
2025-04-13vs SEASCAPE SC 55AW9.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesMonica Rua / Leslie Tracy vs Amy Clark / Aoife Wilson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrenda Berke / Kathrin Brown vs Lena Wikner / Vivian Gunnerengen3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Scattini / Jean Stivers vs Ann King / Laura Towle6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-06vs SEASCAPE SC 55AW9.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesMargaret Hudson / Leslie Tracy vs Jodi Andrews / Vivian Gunnerengen6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathleen Chassion / Laura Ravalin vs Ann King / Kim Halvorsen6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLynn Holt / Stephanie Scattini vs Chizuko Heney / Roxanne Harrison6-0, 6-3
2025-03-29vs SEASCAPE SC 55AW9.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesHelen Potter / Leslie Tracy vs Robin Balowitz / Wendi Eckardt6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLynne Johnson / Monica Rua vs Vivian Gunnerengen / Lisa Tripp6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGena Sagin / Linda Scholink vs Kim Halvorsen / Ann King1-6, 2-6
2025-03-22vs SEASCAPE SC 55AW9.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Andrews / Lynne Johnson vs Robin Balowitz / Lisa Tripp6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Chassion / Monica Rua vs Wendi Eckardt / Laura Towle6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLynn Holt / Stephanie Scattini vs Kim Halvorsen / Ann King6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Lynne Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.29
Andrea Bohn Eisinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
Christine Fleige
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Helen Potter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.06
Brenda Berke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Lynn Holt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.02
Kathrin Brown
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.01
Mary Gregorius
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.00
Gena Sagin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Lauren Lyssy Haase
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.91
Laura Ravalin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Susan Ajeska
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Stephanie Scattini
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Linda Scholink
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jean Stivers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Chassion
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Leslie Tracy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Monica Rua
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Ravalin + Christine Fleige314 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Chassion + Lynn Holt303 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Bohn Eisinger + Gena Sagin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynne Johnson
13W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
4.59
4.5
Andrea Bohn Eisinger
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Christine Fleige
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
Helen Potter
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Brenda Berke
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
Lynn Holt
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.02
Kathrin Brown
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Mary Gregorius
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
Gena Sagin
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
Lauren Lyssy Haase
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.93
Laura Ravalin
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.91
Susan Ajeska
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.83
Stephanie Scattini
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.82
Linda Scholink
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.15
Jean Stivers
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Chassion
7W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Tracy
5W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Hudson
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Rua
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.