Teams

CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Centre Court Rajchel Sun 10 $20

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA ESL 55&O W 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.70 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Raquel Karpinski vs Julie Colhoun / Annette Hennessy6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIrene Powers / Ann Wiet vs Laura Purcell / Fran Wiechart3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Scheck / Lisa Sanderson vs Nancy Manolis / Maria Lobo-Corey3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesKaori Kobayashi / Patricia Behnke vs Julie Sujack / Katrin Maldre6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMiriam Abe / Debra Scheck vs Kimberly Wojack / Sheryl Martin4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Sanderson / Nancy Maska vs Colleen Roberts / Kimberly Glunz6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Irene Powers vs Julie Ladewig / Egle Nemickaite6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaori Kobayashi / Ann Wiet vs Joanne Krug / Conni Stinek4-6, 2-5
L#3 DoublesPatricia Behnke / Julie Pawula vs Zagorka James / Jan MacK2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Patricia Behnke vs Mary Etherington / Laurie Gray5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Scheck / Mya Murata vs Mimi Paffrath / Gayle Dominicis6-7, 0-6
L#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Mya Murata vs Pam Fisher / Sheila Bondoc3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMiriam Abe / Julie Pawula vs Rosemary Wheeler / Vina Maniquis6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaori Kobayashi / Nancy Maska vs Christina Greeley / Rosa Hugener6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Raquel Karpinski vs Teri Andersen / Dorothy OMalley6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMiriam Abe / Joanne Rajchel vs Mary Ellen Young / Amy Harper2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Wiet / Lisa Sanderson vs Sue Keough / Marjorie Bogdalek6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA ESL 55&O W 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Tam Corey Sun 6 $225113515145
2CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $205111717148
3CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Nielsen Lloyd Sat 4 $2042144998
4CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Centre Court Rajchel Sun 10 $203381024173
5CDTA E 55&O W8.0 MT Bann Greeley Sat 2 $252471123151
6CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Naperville Bianchi Sun 4:30 $251571124181
7CDTA E 55&O W8.0 TF Oak Park Roberts Sat 4 $241531531195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Stephanie Batka
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.79
Miriam Abe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Patricia Behnke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Kaori Kobayashi
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Raquel Karpinski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Mya Murata
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Irene Powers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Nancy Maska
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Debra Scheck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Ann Wiet
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Julie Pawula
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Lisa Sanderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Audene Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Joanne Rajchel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raquel Karpinski + Miriam Abe6657% games+8.4% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Patricia Behnke8556% games+3.5% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Raquel Karpinski91451% games+2.2% vs expected
Mya Murata + Patricia Behnke6257% games+1.6% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Miriam Abe9554% games+0.3% vs expected
Joanne Rajchel + Patricia Behnke91150% games−0.7% vs expected
Mya Murata + Stephanie Batka11752% games−3.4% vs expected
Raquel Karpinski + Patricia Behnke81945% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Batka
329W–235L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
Miriam Abe
64W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Patricia Behnke
103W–89L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
Kaori Kobayashi
21W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Raquel Karpinski
83W–105L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Mya Murata
95W–100L career · 2 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Irene Powers
32W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Nancy Maska
52W–89L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Debra Scheck
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Ann Wiet
102W–97L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Julie Pawula
73W–120L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Lisa Sanderson
14W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Audene Gordon
69W–72L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.94
Joanne Rajchel
40W–76L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.