Teams

CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Naperville Bianchi Sun 4:30 $25

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA ESL 55&O W 8.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.60 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesSusan Stahelin / Cynthia McCarthy vs Angela Hanson / Annette Hennessy3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMartha Skryd / Mary Ellen Young vs Ling Arenson / Nancy Manolis6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Harper / Dorothy OMalley vs Ali Gerstad / Fran Wiechart3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesGail Kennedy / Dorothy OMalley vs Julie Sujack / Katrin Maldre1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMary Jo Kamarauskas / Cynthia McCarthy vs Judy Weik / Sue Rhomberg2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTracy MacKh / Martha Skryd vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesCynthia McCarthy / Susan Stahelin vs Suzanne Reed / Elisa Zusman6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Harper / Lisa Laham vs Linda Meyer / Rosemary Wheeler2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarjorie Bogdalek / Karin Carney vs Sheila Bondoc / Rochelle Meng3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesTeri Andersen / Dorothy OMalley vs Stephanie Batka / Raquel Karpinski0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Ellen Young / Amy Harper vs Miriam Abe / Joanne Rajchel6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSue Keough / Marjorie Bogdalek vs Ann Wiet / Lisa Sanderson4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesDorothy OMalley / Tracy MacKh vs Jan MacK / Janice McKane6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMartha Skryd / Mary Ellen Young vs Julie Ladewig / Conni Stinek7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGail Kennedy / Lisa Laham vs Zagorka James / Susan Tuthill4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA ESL 55&O W 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Tam Corey Sun 6 $225113515145
2CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $205111717148
3CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Nielsen Lloyd Sat 4 $2042144998
4CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Centre Court Rajchel Sun 10 $203381024173
5CDTA E 55&O W8.0 MT Bann Greeley Sat 2 $252471123151
6CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Naperville Bianchi Sun 4:30 $251571124181
7CDTA E 55&O W8.0 TF Oak Park Roberts Sat 4 $241531531195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Dorothy OMalley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Mary Ellen Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Martha Skryd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Susan Stahelin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Mary Jo Kamarauskas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Sue Keough
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Debbie Abunassar
published 3.5
3.27
Cynthia McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Amy Harper
published 3.5
3.24
Karin Carney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Teri Andersen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Gail Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Katherine Bianchi
published
Cynthia Stark
published
Lisa Laham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Marjorie Bogdalek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tracy MacKh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Ellen Young + Martha Skryd8256% games+5.1% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Martha Skryd8851% games+3.0% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Gail Kennedy8258% games+2.4% vs expected
Mary Ellen Young + Gail Kennedy6357% games+1.3% vs expected
Martha Skryd + Sue Keough4746% games−1.1% vs expected
Katherine Bianchi + Cynthia McCarthy5348% games−1.9% vs expected
Teri Andersen + Martha Skryd2833% games−3.4% vs expected
Cynthia McCarthy + Gail Kennedy4455% games−6.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dorothy OMalley
173W–204L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Mary Ellen Young
112W–107L career · 3 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Martha Skryd
87W–123L career · 3 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Susan Stahelin
26W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.39
3.5
Mary Jo Kamarauskas
40W–50L career · type S · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Sue Keough
57W–110L career · 1 line in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Debbie Abunassar
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cynthia McCarthy
76W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amy Harper
29W–50L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Karin Carney
126W–103L career · 1 line in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Teri Andersen
35W–84L career · 1 line in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Gail Kennedy
50W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Katherine Bianchi
84W–66L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
Cynthia Stark
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Laham
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marjorie Bogdalek
42W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy MacKh
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.