Teams

CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Tam Corey Sun 6 $22

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA ESL 55&O W 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.94 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesJulie Colhoun / Annette Hennessy vs Stephanie Batka / Raquel Karpinski2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Purcell / Fran Wiechart vs Irene Powers / Ann Wiet6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Manolis / Maria Lobo-Corey vs Debra Scheck / Lisa Sanderson6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesAngela Hanson / Annette Hennessy vs Susan Stahelin / Cynthia McCarthy6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLing Arenson / Nancy Manolis vs Martha Skryd / Mary Ellen Young2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAli Gerstad / Fran Wiechart vs Amy Harper / Dorothy OMalley6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesAli Gerstad / Jill Siegel vs Sara Marberry / Martha Lloyd6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLing Arenson / Angela Hanson vs Kelly O'Donnell / Kimberly Ricchio5-7, 2-5
W#3 DoublesLaura Purcell / Fran Wiechart vs Roseann Solak / Cheryl Watkins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJulie Colhoun / Annette Hennessy vs Katrin Maldre / Julie Sujack6-4, 5-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Nick / Gail Wilson vs Colleen Roberts / Sheryl Martin6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Ali Gerstad vs Kimberly Glunz / Lisa Bierman6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesAngela Hanson / Annette Hennessy vs Beth Immen / Janice McKane7-6, 2-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Julie Weidner vs Erica Eisner / Zagorka James2-6, 3-4
L#3 DoublesJulie Colhoun / Fran Wiechart vs Joanne Krug / Kristin Lueken7-6, 2-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJulie Colhoun / Annette Hennessy vs Linda Meyer / Rosemary Wheeler6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGail Wilson / Patricia Nick vs Rosa Hugener / Julie Alexander6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Purcell / Julie Weidner vs Christina Greeley / Rochelle Meng6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA ESL 55&O W 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Tam Corey Sun 6 $225113515145
2CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $205111717148
3CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Nielsen Lloyd Sat 4 $2042144998
4CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Centre Court Rajchel Sun 10 $203381024173
5CDTA E 55&O W8.0 MT Bann Greeley Sat 2 $252471123151
6CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Naperville Bianchi Sun 4:30 $251571124181
7CDTA E 55&O W8.0 TF Oak Park Roberts Sat 4 $241531531195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Jill Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Annette Hennessy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Gail Wilson
published 4
3.69
Laura Purcell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Fran Wiechart
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Ling Arenson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Julie Weidner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Nancy Manolis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Angela Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Ali Gerstad
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Maria Lobo-Corey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Noreen Ohcana
published
Julie Colhoun
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Patricia Nick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Lobo-Corey + Jill Siegel4366% games+11.8% vs expected
Ling Arenson + Julie Weidner12851% games+8.8% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Nancy Manolis10360% games+4.1% vs expected
Annette Hennessy + Angela Hanson161848% games+3.7% vs expected
Laura Purcell + Fran Wiechart5451% games+3.3% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Julie Weidner203349% games+2.3% vs expected
Julie Weidner + Angela Hanson6951% games+2.2% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Angela Hanson111449% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Siegel
84W–79L career · 1 line in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Annette Hennessy
150W–161L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Gail Wilson
25W–44L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Purcell
158W–161L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Fran Wiechart
40W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Ling Arenson
54W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Julie Weidner
167W–156L career · 2 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Nancy Manolis
114W–130L career · 2 lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
3.56
4
Angela Hanson
119W–137L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Ali Gerstad
123W–151L career · 3 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
276W–244L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Noreen Ohcana
66W–95L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.43
Julie Colhoun
36W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Nick
46W–77L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.