Teams

CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Nielsen Lloyd Sat 4 $20

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA ESL 55&O W 8.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesGayle Dominicis / Hoda Elshakankery vs Rochelle Meng / Patti Charman6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSara Marberry / Silvia Kusaka vs Rosemary Wheeler / Linda Meyer6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaurie Gray / Martha Lloyd vs Julie Alexander / Rosa Hugener6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesGayle Dominicis / Kelly O'Donnell vs Erica Eisner / Joanne Krug6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHoda Elshakankery / Martha Lloyd vs Terra Jahns / Zagorka James6-3, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLaurie Gray / Diane McKillen vs Julie Ladewig / Egle Nemickaite3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesSara Marberry / Martha Lloyd vs Ali Gerstad / Jill Siegel4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKelly O'Donnell / Kimberly Ricchio vs Ling Arenson / Angela Hanson7-5, 5-2
L#3 DoublesRoseann Solak / Cheryl Watkins vs Laura Purcell / Fran Wiechart3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMary Etherington / Laurie Gray vs Stephanie Batka / Patricia Behnke7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMimi Paffrath / Gayle Dominicis vs Debra Scheck / Mya Murata7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDebra Brambora / Carlene Motto vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-29Won 30
W#1 DoublesLaury Scheyer / Mary Etherington vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Watkins / Mimi Paffrath vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSilvia Kusaka / Kimberly Ricchio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesGayle Dominicis / Kelly O'Donnell vs Katrin Maldre / Karie Scrogin6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDiane McKillen / Carlene Motto vs Jeanne Gallo / Sheryl Martin7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMartha Lloyd / Roseann Solak vs Athena Uslander / Kimberly Glunz6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA ESL 55&O W 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Tam Corey Sun 6 $225113515145
2CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $205111717148
3CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Nielsen Lloyd Sat 4 $2042144998
4CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Centre Court Rajchel Sun 10 $203381024173
5CDTA E 55&O W8.0 MT Bann Greeley Sat 2 $252471123151
6CDTA E 55&O W8.0 Naperville Bianchi Sun 4:30 $251571124181
7CDTA E 55&O W8.0 TF Oak Park Roberts Sat 4 $241531531195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Hoda Elshakankery
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Silvia Kusaka
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Kimberly Ricchio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Gayle Dominicis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Mary Etherington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Debra Brambora
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Carlene Motto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Laurie Gray
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Cheryl Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Martha Lloyd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Roseann Solak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Diane McKillen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Laury Scheyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.22
Mimi Paffrath
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kelly O'Donnell
published
Sara Marberry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Brambora + Hoda Elshakankery24467% games+9.3% vs expected
Sara Marberry + Silvia Kusaka9459% games+8.4% vs expected
Mary Etherington + Gayle Dominicis14362% games+5.0% vs expected
Martha Lloyd + Roseann Solak5165% games+2.9% vs expected
Hoda Elshakankery + Gayle Dominicis632059% games+2.4% vs expected
Kimberly Ricchio + Hoda Elshakankery8653% games+2.3% vs expected
Kimberly Ricchio + Gayle Dominicis6455% games+1.8% vs expected
Hoda Elshakankery + Laurie Gray331260% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hoda Elshakankery
216W–111L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.16
4
Silvia Kusaka
232W–160L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Kimberly Ricchio
88W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Gayle Dominicis
229W–135L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Mary Etherington
110W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Debra Brambora
180W–106L career · 1 line in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Carlene Motto
131W–124L career · 1 line in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.67
Laurie Gray
162W–113L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Cheryl Watkins
72W–57L career · 1 line in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Martha Lloyd
216W–148L career · 4 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Roseann Solak
34W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Diane McKillen
89W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Laury Scheyer
56W–44L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Mimi Paffrath
76W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Kelly O'Donnell
71W–38L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Marberry
124W–87L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.