Teams

N OR-WHRC-Taylor

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Sage Katayama
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.51
Atom Fjeldsted
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.33
Paige Polizois
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.17
Yuko Hopman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.16
Mayla Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Matt Simmering
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.04
Michelle Donato
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.91
Kristin Taylor
published 4.5
3.80
Zach Bergthold
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Shannon Roarke
published 4
Results8 ties
2023-12-02Won 20
W#1 DoublesMatt Simmering / Yuko Hopman vs Heidi Clark / Franklin Truong7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSon Huynh / Michelle Donato vs Claire Thayer / Joerg Droste6-3, 6-4
2023-11-17Won 30
W#1 DoublesPaige Polizois / Atom Fjeldsted vs Sierra Wright / Frank Collie6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRyan Chin / Mayla Morgan vs Heike Droste / Joerg Droste6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Cheng / Yuko Hopman vs Sue Gregoire / Kevin Heller6-4, 6-1
2023-11-06Won 20
W#1 DoublesAtom Fjeldsted / Yuko Hopman vs Tamara Justus / Misha DeWolf7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSon Huynh / Michelle Donato vs Eric Furuya / Honghui Liang6-3, 7-5
2023-10-28Won 20
W#2 DoublesMonika Thon / Matt Simmering vs Noriko Satake / Brian Quisling6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSon Huynh / Michelle Donato vs Brian Hendrickson / Maddie Karpinski6-3, 6-2
2023-10-14Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Chen / Paige Polizois vs Lauren Skelly / Elijah Nelson6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrew Pritchard / Mayla Morgan vs Kaitlin Bos / Alexander Calpagiu2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSage Katayama / Kristin Taylor vs Owen Suagee / Inna Vlad7-5, 6-4
2023-10-08Won 20
W#1 DoublesSage Katayama / Kristin Taylor vs John Bui / Grace Lee6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMatt Simmering / Monika Thon vs Sammy Bui / Anh Ngo6-2, 6-3
2023-10-01Won 21
W#1 DoublesAtom Fjeldsted / Yuko Hopman vs Sarah Ferrer / Kevin Jarvis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRyan Chin / Mayla Morgan vs Tarynn Berkman / Christopher Evola5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaige Polizois / Zach Bergthold vs Shaun Anderson / Lisa Grant6-4, 6-0
2023-09-16Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Taylor / Sage Katayama vs Marcus Eyth / JENNIFER BELOY3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Chen / Paige Polizois vs Mike Robertson / Sandra Barnes7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Pritchard / Mayla Morgan vs Amy Juppenlatz Sweet / Jae Joon Kang6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Sage Katayama
58W–24L career
0%33%67%
4.59
4.5
Atom Fjeldsted
83W–26L career
0%55%45%
4.51
4.5
Paige Polizois
61W–38L career
0%95%5%
4.33
4.5
Yuko Hopman
116W–79L career
1%99%0%
4.17
4.5
Mayla Morgan
74W–28L career
2%98%0%
4.16
4.5
Matt Simmering
104W–61L career
4%96%0%
4.08
4.5
Michelle Donato
106W–70L career
9%91%0%
4.04
4.5
Kristin Taylor
49W–39L career
36%64%0%
3.91
4
Zach Bergthold
40W–47L career
0%98%1%
3.80
4
Shannon Roarke
84W–20L career
1%99%1%
3.77

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.