Teams

Idaho/Brigham/55&Over/7.0M

2022 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 3.55 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-08vs Older Than DirtWon 10
W#3 DoublesJames Mertz / Kirk Whittaker vs Christopher Lind / Darrell Ludders7-5, 6-2
2022-06-29vs Have FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Montamat / Kirk Whittaker vs Phillip Bowden / Richard Kim6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-06-10vs Older Than DirtLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Montamat / Kirk Whittaker vs DOUGLAS de BURGH / Christopher Lind6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-08vs Have FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesJim Baker / Kirk Whittaker vs Phillip Bowden / Richard Kim4-6, 5-7
2022-05-25vs Have FunWon 10
W#3 DoublesDit Dudley / Kirk Whittaker vs John Capobres / Bill Fritz6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Brigham/55&Over/7.0M7119514171
2Older Than Dirt2681636248

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Steven Garcia
published 4
3.47
Jim Brigham
published 3.5
3.46
David Umberger
published 3.5
3.39
James Mertz
published 3.5
3.37
John Chavez
published 3.5
3.36
Dit Dudley
published 3.5
3.35
Jim Baker
published 3.5
Darin Frost
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Fritz Durham
published 3.5
3.00
Steven Buchanan
published 3.5
Kirk Whittaker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Stephen Montamat
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darin Frost + Fritz Durham14861% games+16.1% vs expected
John Chavez + Steven Garcia11464% games+7.7% vs expected
Dit Dudley + Steven Garcia28864% games+7.2% vs expected
Darin Frost + Jim Brigham1142660% games+7.2% vs expected
Dit Dudley + John Chavez7359% games+6.9% vs expected
Dit Dudley + Fritz Durham3358% games+1.4% vs expected
John Chavez + Jim Brigham14754% games−0.8% vs expected
Steven Buchanan + David Umberger13753% games−2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Steven Garcia
182W–119L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Jim Brigham
195W–84L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
David Umberger
85W–58L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.46
3.5
James Mertz
187W–123L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
John Chavez
181W–102L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Dit Dudley
159W–107L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Jim Baker
62W–55L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Darin Frost
93W–45L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Fritz Durham
85W–91L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Steven Buchanan
80W–110L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
Kirk Whittaker
42W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Montamat
29W–25L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.