Teams

DTC #1

2024 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 7.0 MEN- 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-07vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT55&OVER/M7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTom Tanksley / Rod Allison vs Sam Bauzon / Meynardo Sanchez6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Jones / Marc Albert vs Rod Faircloth / Stephen Newell3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Slayter / Jeff Hartman vs Alfredo Sabillo / Tony Devera3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-31vs SPANISH OAKSWon 21
W#1 DoublesTom Tanksley / Rod Allison vs Michael Blonsky / Rob Velasco6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrady Stevens / JOHN MacDONALD vs Michael Miller / Shaine Stevenson6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeff Hartman / Craig Slayter vs Absalom Alcaraz / Brent Muir1-6, 4-6
2024-05-17vs DTC #2Won 21
W#1 DoublesJack Braman / Rod Allison vs Brad Davis / Maurice Silva6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJOHN MacDONALD / Craig Slayter vs Michael Garvin / Sandy Mann2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCharles Jones / Brady Stevens vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-10vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT55&OVER/M7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJOHN MacDONALD / Brady Stevens vs Robert Roig / Khanh Nguyen4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJack Braman / Craig Slayter vs Jonathan Rodriguez / Jabo Tang2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Jones / Marc Albert vs Rod Faircloth / James Santos6-7, 6-7
2024-05-03vs DTC #2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCharles Jones / JOHN MacDONALD vs Brad Davis / William Feast6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJack Braman / Marc Albert vs Maurice Silva / Samuel Gordon2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBrady Stevens / Craig Slayter vs Michael Garvin / Michael Rudolph6-2, 6-4
2024-05-02vs SPANISH OAKSLost 12
L#1 DoublesJack Braman / Tom Tanksley vs Scot Martin / Brent Muir3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrady Stevens / Rod Allison vs Dan Hale / KRISTON QUALLS6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCraig Slayter / Marc Albert vs Rick Holden / Rob Velasco2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-19vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT55&OVER/M7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTom Tanksley / Rod Allison vs Charles Forbile / Edgar Rizarri6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarc Albert / Craig Slayter vs Khanh Nguyen / Robert Roig1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Jones / JOHN MacDONALD vs James Santos / Stephen Newell5-7, 3-6
2024-04-12vs SPANISH OAKSLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarc Albert / Tom Tanksley vs Scot Martin / Brent Muir6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Jones / Brady Stevens vs Rick Holden / KRISTON QUALLS6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCraig Slayter / JOHN MacDONALD vs Darin McKinney / George Mulopulos2-6, 4-6
2024-04-05vs DTC #2Won 30
W#1 DoublesJack Braman / Tom Tanksley vs Thomas Waite / Michael Rudolph7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCharles Jones / JOHN MacDONALD vs William Feast / Timothy Havasi6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarc Albert / Jeff Hartman vs Sandy Mann / Maurice Silva6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Rod Allison
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Charles Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
JOHN MacDONALD
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.14
Brady Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Jack Braman
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Tom Tanksley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Craig Slayter
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Jeff Hartman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Marc Albert
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Tanksley + Jack Braman10459% games+3.1% vs expected
Brady Stevens + Charles Jones141550% games+0.6% vs expected
Jack Braman + Craig Slayter4740% gamesnot enough data
JOHN MacDONALD + Jack Braman1542% gamesnot enough data
Brady Stevens + Craig Slayter2447% gamesnot enough data
Craig Slayter + Marc Albert3248% gamesnot enough data
Tom Tanksley + Rod Allison224 matchesnot enough data
JOHN MacDONALD + Charles Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rod Allison
31W–39L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Charles Jones
98W–110L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
JOHN MacDONALD
102W–85L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Brady Stevens
93W–105L career · 6 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Jack Braman
96W–97L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Tom Tanksley
44W–60L career · type A · 15 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3.5
Craig Slayter
103W–194L career · 8 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.86
Jeff Hartman
25W–17L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marc Albert
34W–70L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.