Teams

Arbor Greene Snipers - P. Williams

2021 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Men · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2020-12-05vs Buckhorn BallersWon 20
W#1 DoublesEugene Martineau / CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON vs Chris Chee-A-Tow / Jeffrey Garbus6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesPaul Williams vs Aziz Bouroua1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2020-11-07Split 11
L#1 DoublesJose Alomar / Tom Layton vs Michael Leeds / Ross Feldman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPaul Williams vs Andrew Mintz7-5, 7-6
2020-10-25vs Cheval Kings - J. KniermanWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Williams / Jagan Punjal vs Andrew Roig / Stephen McCormick6-4, 6-1
2020-10-24vs Buckhorn BallersWon 10
W#1 SinglesPaul Williams vs Aziz Bouroua6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesCHRISTOPHER THOMPSON / Tom Layton vs Michael Bitting / Erik Hajek7-5, 7-6
2020-10-10vs Tampa Yacht White - A. CarricatoLost 02
L#1 SinglesPaul Williams vs Aaron Carricato2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSundar Ekambaram / Eugene Martineau vs David Germain / James Lass4-6, 4-6
2020-09-26vs HCC Vamos - J. OrsiniLost 01
L#2 DoublesEugene Martineau / Jakob Andersen vs Elvin Vargas / Jeffrey Hirsch1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
3.84
Jakob Andersen
published 4
3.80
Jose Alomar
published
3.76
Eugene Martineau
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Paul Williams
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.63
Sundar Ekambaram
published
3.46
Tom Layton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Williams + Jakob Andersen6257% games+3.8% vs expected
Eugene Martineau + Paul Williams7555% gamesnot enough data
Tom Layton + Paul Williams4261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
4W–13L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
4.06
4
Jakob Andersen
12W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.84
Jose Alomar
15W–8L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Eugene Martineau
57W–46L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
Paul Williams
136W–82L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
Sundar Ekambaram
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
Srinivasulu Navuluri
10W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.46
Tom Layton
40W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.