Teams

NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 6.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Tracy Dennis
published
3.50
Christine Malloy
published 3.5
3.41
Eleanor Cooper
published
3.38
Nicoletta Camerin
published
3.36
Monica Ravanello
published
3.33
Brie Cadman
published 3.5
3.31
Annika Fischer
published 3.5
3.16
Judith Alex
published
3.09
Jennifer Locke
published
3.09
Lindsey Levine
published
2.94
Michelle van de Pol
published
2.91
Madeline Shellhouse
published
2.73
Jamie Cegelski
published
2.72
Rowchelle Julian
published
2.70
Lindy Bouwer
published
2.59
2.46
Diane de Seve
published 2.5
Mari Morris
published
Teresa Levin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Dennis
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Christine Malloy
12W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Eleanor Cooper
24W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Nicoletta Camerin
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Monica Ravanello
26W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Brie Cadman
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Annika Fischer
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Judith Alex
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Jennifer Locke
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lindsey Levine
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Michelle van de Pol
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
Madeline Shellhouse
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Jamie Cegelski
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Rowchelle Julian
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Lindy Bouwer
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Alexandra Lorraine
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
2.5
Diane de Seve
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%61%39%
2.46
Mari Morris
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Teresa Levin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.