Teams

LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV

2021 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 18 & OVER · 3.0 WOMEN- 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-23vs CANYON GATE #2Split 22
L#1 DoublesSarah Kingsley / Miriam Pasimio vs Caroline Walton / Lynn Row2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLinda Hawkes vs Alyssa Villafana6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRacquel Toyozaki / Babette Gollier vs Felicia Galati / Rita Spurgin6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAshley Mullins vs Megan Ramous7-5, 6-2
2021-05-08vs TPCLost 12
L#1 SinglesAshley Mullins vs Nicole Horton2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Kingsley / Sarah Kim vs Judith Milligan / Bobbi Miracle3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMiriam Pasimio / Abigail Cox vs Jill Kreston / Deborah Yamane2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-01vs DTC #3Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Mullins / Rachel Smith vs Suzanne Pardee / Robin Gordon6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAbigail Cox vs Eva Gryczon0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Kim / Sarah Kingsley vs Karen Hom / Ann Shah6-2, 6-3
2021-04-24vs CLUB RIDGESSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAshley Mullins / Rachel Smith vs Shellene Goudge / Emily Biehl6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBabette Gollier vs Vinne Chen1-6, 3-6
2021-04-17vs SPANISH OAKSLost 13
L#1 DoublesKatrin Dragnev / Ashley Mullins vs Robyn Schleifman / Ashly Ryan4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLinda Hawkes vs Loretta Moses6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSarah Kingsley / Sarah Kim vs Bree Carlson / Jennifer Roberts6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBabette Gollier / Rachel Smith vs Jocelyn Goldman / Monica Baldwin1-6, 1-6
2021-04-09vs MADEIRA CANYON PARKWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Kim / Sarah Kingsley vs Christina Donelson / Heather Smith5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLinda Hawkes vs Jen White6-2, 6-0
2021-03-27vs SPANISH TRAILWon 21
W#1 DoublesBabette Gollier / Racquel Toyozaki vs Katrin Gajardo / Elizabeth Templeton6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAshley Mullins vs Aida Shirley6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Kingsley / Teri Kerr vs Shelly Figueredo / Gretchen Hau1-6, 5-7
2021-03-20vs DTC #2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBabette Gollier / Rachel Smith vs Christi Lin / Ashley Marx2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Kingsley vs Loc Nguyen3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Mullins / Racquel Toyozaki vs Mandy Willis / Holly Highfill6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN- 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Katrin Dragnev
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.33
Miriam Pasimio
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
Ashley Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Racquel Toyozaki
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Abigail Cox
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.90
Linda Hawkes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Anna Clark
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.59
Brandon Terwilliger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Babette Gollier
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 0
Sarah Kingsley
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Teri Kerr
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Babette Gollier + Racquel Toyozaki2355% games+12.3% vs expected
Racquel Toyozaki + Miriam Pasimio2743% games−3.3% vs expected
Katrin Dragnev + Miriam Pasimio3352% gamesnot enough data
Racquel Toyozaki + Katrin Dragnev4155% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Kingsley + Miriam Pasimio2348% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Kingsley + Ashley Mullins224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katrin Dragnev
172W–118L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Miriam Pasimio
145W–130L career · 13 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Ashley Mullins
43W–27L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Racquel Toyozaki
92W–89L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Abigail Cox
47W–22L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%20%80%
3.11
3
Linda Hawkes
81W–117L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Anna Clark
36W–29L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Brandon Terwilliger
15W–10L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
2.59
0
Babette Gollier
16W–49L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Kingsley
44W–41L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Teri Kerr
18W–62L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.