← Search

Babette Gollier

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
65 matches · 16W–49L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Babette sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Babette is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Babette has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Babette has gone from the 91st to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
46.2%
12W–14L · 49.8% of games
3.5
12.5%
3W–21L · 31.2% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history65 matches
L
Annie Bergman / Carol Adamschamps
2023-09-17 · #3 Doubles · with Adela Smith
+0.020better than expected — took 46% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
Gloria Carpenter / Nancy Thompsonchamps
2023-09-16 · #3 Doubles · with Adela Smith
−0.047below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Becky Wilcox / Sheila Schaubchamps
2023-09-16 · #2 Doubles · with Adela Smith
+0.008about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Chris Peterson / Elizabeth Westchamps
2023-09-15 · #2 Doubles · with Adela Smith
−0.048below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2023-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pat Schuldt
−0.066below expectation — took 25% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2023-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hong Lee
+0.036better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hong Lee
−0.041below expectation — took 8% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Carole Jablon-Bernardi / Karen Duddlesten
2023-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Beecroft
−0.010about as expected — took 43% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Tracey Lee / LOURDES MENDOZA
2023-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hong Lee
−0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2023-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hong Lee
−0.027below expectation — took 28% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Stacy McDonald / Christina Smith
2023-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hong Lee
+0.022better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
2022-11-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvette DeZalia
+0.047better than expected — took 100% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.