Teams

6 Woodlake - ONeill

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-06vs 5 LPC MorganLost 12
L#1 SinglesScott Alcorn vs Will Gauden2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRyan Brown vs Steven Smith1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesAlfred Gamulo vs Robert Meister4-2
2025-11-05vs 8 MAC We R Them - PessarraLost 03
L#1 SinglesRyan Brown vs Kyle Bagley0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBrandon ONeill vs Jay Pettit0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesScott Alcorn vs John Haggai0-6, 0-6
2025-10-15vs 2 Hermitage AdamsWon 21
L#1 SinglesThomas Zuend vs Tim Johnson2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAlfred Gamulo vs Joel McClellan6-1, 7-5
W#3 SinglesBrandon ONeill vs Douglas Lines6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-08vs 11 Burkwood 3.0 - ButterworthLost 03
L#1 SinglesThomas Zuend vs Andrew Hylton3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAlfred Gamulo vs Benjamin Bursae1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesScott Alcorn vs Scott Schoenwiesner2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAlfred Gamulo vs Dylan Holt6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRyan Brown vs Chris Armstrong6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-25vs 7 Westwood WestLost 12
L#1 SinglesScott Alcorn vs Ken West6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBrandon ONeill vs Brian Kinnear3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesThomas Zuend vs Joshua James6-3, 6-3
2025-09-24vs 9 Westwood SnyderLost 03
L#1 SinglesAlfred Gamulo vs Zachary Webb6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesThomas Zuend vs Garrett Bunting3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesRyan Brown vs Philip Noonan1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Ryan Brown
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.69
Thomas Zuend
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.68
Alfred Gamulo
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.58
Scott Alcorn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.37
Brandon ONeill
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Peter Monstello
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Brown
6W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Thomas Zuend
10W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Alfred Gamulo
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
Scott Alcorn
18W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%27%73%
2.58
2.5
Brandon ONeill
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.37
Peter Monstello
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.