Teams

SPANISH OAKS

2021 USTA MIXED LEAGUE 40 & OVER · MIXED 6.0- 40 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-09-08vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Pursel / Susan Mulanax vs Jordan Raub / Josephine McPeak0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Schoolmeester / Edward DiRocco vs Erich Moxley / Candy Rosenberg0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesScot Martin / Adrienne Berman vs Wael Eid / Jana Vogel3-6, 5-7
2021-09-02vs CANYON GATELost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Pursel / Kara Moncrief vs Johnny Underwood / Helen McDaniel3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEdward DiRocco / Jennifer Roberts vs Anjanette Bixel / Carter Heller2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFelicia Galati / Jimmy Brooks vs Rachel Milford / Scott Milford7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2021-09-01vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSLost 02
L#1 DoublesAbsalom Alcaraz / Julie Schoolmeester vs Jordan Raub / Josephine McPeak2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesScot Martin / Adrienne Berman vs Erich Moxley / Candy Rosenberg1-6, 2-6
2021-08-30vs CANYON GATELost 03
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Berman / Scot Martin vs Anjanette Bixel / Carter Heller4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFelicia Galati / Jimmy Brooks vs Jennifer Olson / Johnny Underwood2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKara Moncrief / Daniel Pursel vs Rachel Milford / Scott Milford0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0- 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Scot Martin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Daniel Pursel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Absalom Alcaraz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Felicia Galati
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Julie Schoolmeester
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Adrienne Berman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Jennifer Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scot Martin + Adrienne Berman6750% games−0.2% vs expected
Julie Schoolmeester + Daniel Pursel2343% games−5.5% vs expected
Julie Schoolmeester + Scot Martin1938% games−10.3% vs expected
Daniel Pursel + Adrienne Berman044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Scot Martin
157W–152L career · 3 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Daniel Pursel
87W–84L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Absalom Alcaraz
59W–90L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Felicia Galati
108W–111L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Julie Schoolmeester
75W–90L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Adrienne Berman
160W–205L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
2.69
Jennifer Roberts
26W–55L career · 1 line in 2021
33%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.