Teams

Full Metal Racquets

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.79 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2021-06-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBob Firpo / Indranil Roy vs Ramanjaneya Siddabattuni / Raja Kumar Varma Manthena4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Dawson Crow
published 4
Bob Firpo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Chad Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
Indranil Roy
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Scott Stewart
published 4
3.68
Alex Kuzmenko
published 4
3.64
JAYDIP GUHA
published 4
3.47
Jim Brigham
published 3.5
3.39
James Mertz
published 3.5
3.37
John Chavez
published 3.5
3.36
Dit Dudley
published 3.5
Darin Frost
published 3.5
Adam Hanby
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Steve Gray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darin Frost + Jim Brigham1142660% games+7.2% vs expected
Dit Dudley + John Chavez7359% games+6.9% vs expected
John Chavez + Jim Brigham14754% games−0.8% vs expected
James Mertz + Darin Frost6454% gamesnot enough data
Dit Dudley + Jim Brigham5261% gamesnot enough data
Steve Gray + James Mertz4254% gamesnot enough data
James Mertz + John Chavez2355% gamesnot enough data
James Mertz + Dit Dudley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawson Crow
55W–22L career · type S · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Bob Firpo
62W–32L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
4
Chad Anderson
82W–44L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Indranil Roy
140W–74L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Scott Stewart
68W–66L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Alex Kuzmenko
46W–38L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
JAYDIP GUHA
151W–106L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Jim Brigham
195W–84L career · no lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
James Mertz
187W–123L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
John Chavez
181W–102L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Dit Dudley
159W–107L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Darin Frost
93W–45L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Adam Hanby
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Steve Gray
20W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.