Teams

Je.Sagal Solomon18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-20vs La.Kane18ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Christy van Ness vs Sabrina Kane / Cathy Williams1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Nowicki / Jennifer Sagal Solomon vs Lauren Kane / Rachel Betzwieser3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-12vs Ju.Andrews18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Kethey / Christy van Ness vs Julianne Andrews / Jennifer Badham0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Sagal Solomon / Dana Earle vs Parker Rumley / Melissa Burke3-6, 1-6
2024-05-02vs Ma.Cambo18ALost 13
L#1 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Christy van Ness vs Molly Andrews / Kathryn Horneffer0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Kethey / Erika Peterson vs Sam Fouser / Alina Dawson5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJill Wolborsky vs Xinyang Dong2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sagal Solomon / Dana Earle vs Autumn Beam / Callan Fike7-5, 6-1
2024-04-14vs Co.Haynes18ALost 04
L#1 DoublesErika Peterson / Anna Kethey vs Connie Haynes / Sara Mazurak1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Guy vs Lauren Fye1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJill Wolborsky vs Brianna Shait2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Nowicki / Jennifer Sagal Solomon vs Karen Southern / Michele Lagerstedt3-6, 3-6
2024-04-07vs Kr.Levine18ALost 23
L#1 DoublesCrystal Beard / Michele Nowicki vs Jennifer Kaulback / Elizabeth Carroll4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesErika Peterson vs Jessica Williams6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Christy van Ness vs Beth Farrell / Lisa Dooley4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKhelsey Lemon vs Samantha Pickett1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDana Earle / Corinne Alavi vs Kristen Levine / Laura Stanziale0-6, 1-6
2024-03-17vs Me.Gill18ALost 04
L#1 DoublesChristy van Ness / Michele Nowicki vs Jaime Gaskins / Lowry Liggon1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Anna Kethey vs Abigail Douek / Jackie Morse4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKhelsey Lemon vs Catie Cunningham1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Sagal Solomon / Jennifer Guy vs Melissa DeLorme - (DQ) / Sarah Warren1-6, 1-6
2024-03-10vs Br.Robinson18A3.0Won 32
W#1 DoublesDana Earle / Jennifer Kimball vs Stephanie Gillespie / Rebecca Glendy6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesErika Peterson vs Jennifer Martin5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristy van Ness / McGavock Edwards vs Ellen Zimmerman / Marilyn Gordian6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJill Wolborsky vs Erika Plant1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Guy / Corinne Alavi vs Wendy Roberts / Alexa Spain6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-03-03vs Su.Braga18ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesDana Earle / Anna Kethey vs Sarah Copley / Cassy Albertson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Nowicki / Christy van Ness vs Holly Stephens / Sarah Soleim4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKhelsey Lemon vs Kathryn White1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCorinne Alavi / Jennifer Guy vs Suzanne Braga / Debbie Cox5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Erika Peterson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Jennifer Guy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.00
Michele Nowicki
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.98
Jennifer Kimball
published
2.75
Crystal Beard
published 3
2.67
Dana Earle
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.65
McGavock Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Anna Kethey
published 3
2.56
2.51
Sharon McCloud
published
2.49
Khelsey Lemon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.40
Christy van Ness
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.38
Corinne Alavi
published 2.5
2.25
Jill Wolborsky
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy van Ness + Michele Nowicki4249% games+1.3% vs expected
McGavock Edwards + Dana Earle1534% gamesnot enough data
McGavock Edwards + Christy van Ness2436% gamesnot enough data
Dana Earle + Christy van Ness213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erika Peterson
75W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
3
Jennifer Guy
72W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Michele Nowicki
88W–59L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jennifer Kimball
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Crystal Beard
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Dana Earle
62W–78L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
2.67
3
McGavock Edwards
60W–88L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
2.65
3
Anna Kethey
4W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
Jennifer Sagal Solomon
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
Sharon McCloud
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
2.5
Khelsey Lemon
18W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%52%48%
2.49
2.5
Christy van Ness
74W–119L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%79%21%
2.40
2.5
Corinne Alavi
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Jill Wolborsky
41W–101L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.