Teams

She's Everything

2023 TRI-LEVEL - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 3.95 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-09-24vs Volley GirlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesDenise Schwendener / Lisa Andrews vs Heather Linhart / Mila Wood6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSue Gray / Kimberly Clifford vs Terry Hardy / Heather Rice6-2, 6-4
2023-09-23vs Tri PTSALost 02
L#1 DoublesDenise Schwendener / Leslie Koppenhafer vs Hanna Jacobs / Madelyn Reid4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Clifford / Sue Gray vs Suzanna Murali / Becky Caven1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Lauren Drew
published 4.5
Denise Schwendener
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
3.89
Emily Flores
published 4
3.79
Brijean Brennan
published 4
3.73
Daniela Hefner
published 4
3.61
Colleen Schoeck
published 4
3.60
3.38
Zel Mertz
published 3.5
3.26
Stephanie Churchman
published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Reynolds
published 3.5
Lisa Andrews
published
Sue Gray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Koppenhafer + Kimberly Clifford6259% games+10.0% vs expected
Sue Gray + Kimberly Clifford224 matchesnot enough data
Colleen Schoeck + Zel Mertz224 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Reynolds + Stephanie Churchman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lauren Drew
64W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Denise Schwendener
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Leslie Koppenhafer
233W–121L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Emily Flores
147W–96L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.89
4
Brijean Brennan
140W–108L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Daniela Hefner
36W–31L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Colleen Schoeck
125W–66L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.61
4
Kimberly Clifford
142W–112L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Zel Mertz
310W–181L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Stephanie Churchman
136W–91L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Andrea Reynolds
84W–122L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Lisa Andrews
40W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sue Gray
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.