Teams

PSweeney (Firethorne CC)

2024 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-10vs BBaker (Queens)Won 21
W#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Danielle Gier6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJennifer Pollino vs Kathy Kopec6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesLaura Carpinelli vs Spencer Stoakley6-7
2024-06-26vs ESuppa (PCC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesTARA RAND vs Melissa O'Brien6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesJennifer Voci vs Larissa Soto6-4, 6-2
2024-06-19vs KDay (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesTARA RAND vs Anne Schmitt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Stacey Valitchka6-1, 6-0
2024-06-12vs TInga (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer Voci vs Kate Lauren6-1, 6-4
2024-06-11vs KCronin (Piper Glen)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Cindy Rhoten7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLaura Carpinelli vs Amy DeLaat Marbury0-6, 1-6
2024-05-29vs KCurley (Raintree)Split 11
W#1 SinglesTARA RAND vs Vicky Shannon6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJennifer Pollino vs Susan Chandler7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
TARA RAND
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.98
Caroline Lattanzi
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.87
Jennifer Voci
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.86
Wendy Hall
published
2.79
Jennifer Pollino
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.70
Sue Ann Lang
published
2.54
Renu Renu Gill
published
2.41
Laura Carpinelli
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Voci + TARA RAND5355% gamesnot enough data
Laura Carpinelli + Jennifer Pollino3346% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Pollino + Caroline Lattanzi134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Voci + Caroline Lattanzi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
TARA RAND
86W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Caroline Lattanzi
54W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.98
3
Jennifer Voci
96W–62L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Wendy Hall
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%1%99%
2.86
3
Jennifer Pollino
83W–86L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Sue Ann Lang
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%8%92%
2.70
Renu Renu Gill
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
0%40%60%
2.54
2.5
Laura Carpinelli
20W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%74%26%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.