Teams

Wasatch Hills-Maxfield/Cronin

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W PM

19 players · average NTRP 3.55 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31Won 10
W#1 SinglesMelissa Hofmann vs Kate Franko6-2, 6-2
2023-05-24vs Liberty Park Tennis-Stacey/EwingWon 20
W#2 DoublesBecky Hall / Melissa Hofmann vs Malisa Bowen / LaNece Andreason6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichelle Weddington / Ann Weaver vs Sara Ray / Aislynn Hoang7-5, 6-3
2023-05-22Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMelissa Hofmann vs Alexis Smith1-6, 1-6
2023-04-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Weaver / Melissa Hofmann vs Ann Trentman / Laurie Summers7-6, 6-3
2023-04-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaria Lombardi / Jennifer Wecker vs Janine Nemelka / Sherston Faux6-4, 6-0
2023-04-19Won 10
W#1 SinglesMelissa Hofmann vs Emily Hales7-6, 6-4
2023-04-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesMelissa Hofmann / Becky Hall vs Julie Black / Yoko Walljasper6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Kim Cronin
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published 4
3.60
Sarah Love
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Jacki Joseph
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.40
Jeanette Shepard
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 3.5
3.40
Lindsay Andersen
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.37
Michelle Maxfield
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
3.36
Gretel Sampson
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Melissa Hofmann
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Becky Hall
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Wecker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Michelle Weddington
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.23
Ann Weaver
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Alena Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Jennie Bethers
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.14
Manal Hall
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Maria Lombardi
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.02
Cherylin Winkel
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3.5
Namrata Handlon
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Shoeleh Assemi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Lombardi + Jennie Bethers4159% games+10.9% vs expected
Alena Taylor + Melissa Hofmann4356% games+10.5% vs expected
Manal Hall + Jennifer Wecker4255% games+9.9% vs expected
Michelle Maxfield + Melissa Hofmann5164% games+8.3% vs expected
Manal Hall + Melissa Hofmann2352% games+8.0% vs expected
Jeanette Shepard + Jacki Joseph2651% games+7.3% vs expected
Alena Taylor + Michelle Maxfield7850% games+7.2% vs expected
Kim Cronin + Michelle Maxfield281656% games+5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kim Cronin
380W–237L career · 27 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
Sarah Love
197W–133L career · 15 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Jacki Joseph
223W–156L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Jeanette Shepard
195W–143L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
Lindsay Andersen
117W–67L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Michelle Maxfield
206W–139L career · 13 lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
Gretel Sampson
200W–198L career · 17 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Melissa Hofmann
91W–57L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Becky Hall
189W–166L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Wecker
92W–47L career · 1 line in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Michelle Weddington
57W–43L career · 10 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Ann Weaver
84W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Alena Taylor
178W–200L career · 12 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Jennie Bethers
125W–120L career · 9 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Manal Hall
111W–167L career · 8 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Maria Lombardi
228W–163L career · 13 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Cherylin Winkel
112W–142L career · 14 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Namrata Handlon
62W–57L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Shoeleh Assemi
37W–81L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.