Teams

Northwood/Pask W3.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

20 players · average NTRP 3.56 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26vs High Point/Cavey W3.5Won 50
W#1 DoublesAmanda Francis / Mandy Click vs Cissy Boyle / Ngoc Foster7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChelsea Wilderotter vs Lori Bennett6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLisa Sucato / Jessica Tse vs Anne Savino / Ana Paez7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKaty Brooks vs Jeanine Michna-Bales6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNicole Hudson / Dana Woram vs Meredith Foster / Rebecca Bennett7-5, 6-3
2025-06-19vs Brook Hollow/Stephenson W3.5Won 31
W#1 DoublesLisa Sucato / Chelsea Wilderotter vs Heidi Hill / Betsy Stephenson6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKaty Brooks vs Allison Stensrud6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRachel Pask vs Stephanie Marynick6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLeigh Koch / Lane Clark vs Audrey Robertson / Sunny Knocke1-6, 4-6
2025-06-05vs Garland/Howarth-Grandle W3.5Won 40
W#1 DoublesKaty Brooks / Chelsea Wilderotter vs Megan Bell / Katie Woodley6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMandy Click vs Melissa McKee6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDana Woram / Jessica Tse vs Ellison Howarth / Katie Moore6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCourtney McCauley vs Leeanne Seely6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesDori Ware / Lisa Kelly vs Marcy Mignardi / Amy Northrop6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMandy Click vs Lilian Bowari6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDana Woram / Missy Robinson vs Karen Clemmons / Susan Toliver6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKaty Brooks vs Aly Halpern6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesDori Ware / Lisa Sucato vs Heidi McKee / Hsiao-Lan Wilson7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMandy Click vs Samantha Calderon4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Pask / Dana Woram vs Leigh Powell / Joanne Freebairn6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesErin McKool vs Maia Lamarque6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-05-15vs Lakewood/Cholerton-Tucker W3.5Won 50
W#1 DoublesLisa Kelly / Katy Brooks vs Jennifer Campiti / Shannon Henderson6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChelsea Wilderotter vs Shirley Crow6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnn Pask / Dana Woram vs Kimberly Warren / Jacqueline Winslow4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRachel Pask vs Chrissy Kuo6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJudy Marlow / Courtney McCauley vs Aimee Cook / Annamari Lannon6-1, 6-1
2025-05-08vs Samuell Grand/Kilcullen-Shuff W3.5Split 22
L#1 DoublesMandy Click / Katy Brooks vs Sara Straley / Emily Suter1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesChelsea Wilderotter vs Lindsey Hutchinson7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Francis / Tonya McKinney vs Angelina Kilcullen / Jennifer Shuff6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCourtney McCauley / Ann Pask vs Lacy Bain / Kelsey Hills4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-05-02vs Fretz/Buechel W3.5Won 41
L#1 DoublesTammy Byrd / Dori Ware vs Timla Healey / Donna BELLE6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMandy Click vs Becky Sherwood6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Pask / Dana Woram vs Sherri Rejebian / Cynthia Jankovich6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRachel Pask vs Adreon Morgan6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMissy Robinson / Jill Hamilton vs Dorothy Buechel / Tracy Graivier7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings29 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chandlers Landing/Oelke-Lee W3.58035517234
2DCC/Slaven W3.580301024237
3Northwood/Pask W3.57133720248
4The Nelson/Stoll-Wood W3.571301030319
5Lakes @ Castle Hills/Lewis-Boronski W3.5 (F2025 WC)71261436322
6Samuell Grand/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.571251542371
7DAC/Starnes-Willson W3.562291126279
8Lakes/Akbany-Little W3.562251533302
9RGAC/Lucas W3.553231739322
10McKinney/Hedblom W3.553251540334
11Lakes/Leeper-Bingham W3.553241641369
12Brook Hollow/Stephenson W3.544211943359
13El Dorado/Miller W3.544202044348
14Fretz/Buechel W3.544182249380
15Stonebridge/Giacchino-Cantu W3.544202050391
16Garland/Howarth-Grandle W3.535192146348
17High Point/Tucker-Wise-Itscovitch W3.535202048350
18High Point/Escutia W3.535182249370
19Bent Tree/Sarché-Wilder W3.535152552400
20Gleneagles/Steyn-Priebe W3.535162453400
21T bar M/Mizerany-Benson W3.535142657403
22DAC/Frazure-Shepardson W3.535122860409
23Royal Oaks/Copley W.526202043366
24Las Colinas/Demarque W3.526152553388
25McKinney/Griffiths-Sullivan W3.526132759407
26SpringPark/Eubank-Middlebrook W3.517103065420
27Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.508112961411
28Canyon Creek/Cotter-Allen W3.508112962436
29Lakewood/Cholerton-Tucker W3.50873368439

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Chelsea Wilderotter
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
Dori Ware
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Courtney McCauley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Chrissy Collins
published 3.5
3.38
Mandy Click
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Amanda Francis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Ann Pask
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Erin McKool
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Judy Marlow
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.20
Lisa Sucato
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Dana Woram
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.99
Jill Hamilton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Leigh Koch
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jessica Tse
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Katy Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Lane Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lesley Ooley
published
Rachel Pask
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Tammy Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tonya McKinney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Pask + Ann Pask303 matchesnot enough data
Ann Pask + Dana Woram303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chelsea Wilderotter
14W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Dori Ware
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Courtney McCauley
11W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Chrissy Collins
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Mandy Click
10W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Amanda Francis
12W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Ann Pask
15W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Erin McKool
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Judy Marlow
9W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Lisa Sucato
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Dana Woram
11W–1L career · 6 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jill Hamilton
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Leigh Koch
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.87
Jessica Tse
13W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katy Brooks
11W–1L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lane Clark
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lesley Ooley
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Pask
8W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Byrd
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tonya McKinney
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.