Teams

El Dorado/Miller W3.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26vs Samuell Grand/Hilliard-Melson W3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Berg / Lindsey Widtfeldt vs Kathy Fagan / Libby Johnson6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-19vs Canyon Creek/Cotter-Allen W3.5Won 21
W#2 DoublesErma Bryant / Tatyana Borukhovich vs MRecia Beshires / Meghan Rosener6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLindsey Widtfeldt vs Kim Henke6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Paulson / Raquel Harris vs Debbie Bradshaw / Michele Erturkuner6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-18vs High Point/Escutia W3.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Berg / Amy MacNicol vs Omara Al-Hafi / Jeanette Johnson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRaquel Harris vs Nancy Horan1-6, 2-6
2025-06-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesJuly Crockett / Amy MacNicol vs Brooke McGonigle / Sarah Patterson6-2, 6-0
2025-05-29vs Stonebridge/Giacchino-Cantu W3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Berg / Amy MacNicol vs Shannon Hellerman / Nicole Libby4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Carter / Tatyana Borukhovich vs Carrie Martinson / Dianne Dolly Reid6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMacKenzie Miller / Raquel Harris vs Corrine Gregor / LeAnne Ray0-6, 1-6
2025-05-22vs Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy MacNicol / Lindsey Widtfeldt vs Allison Singleton / Stephanie Friedman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-15vs McKinney/Hedblom W3.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesLindsey Widtfeldt / Amy MacNicol vs Sandi Silverman / Judy Steglich6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRaquel Harris / Diane Carter vs Donna Legault / April Richardson0-6, 1-6
2025-05-08vs Oak Creek/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Carter / Lindsey Widtfeldt vs Lacey Gardner / Emily Simon3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTatyana Borukhovich / Erma Bryant vs Sarah Clayton / Kim Velevis6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings29 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chandlers Landing/Oelke-Lee W3.58035517234
2DCC/Slaven W3.580301024237
3Northwood/Pask W3.57133720248
4The Nelson/Stoll-Wood W3.571301030319
5Lakes @ Castle Hills/Lewis-Boronski W3.5 (F2025 WC)71261436322
6Samuell Grand/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.571251542371
7DAC/Starnes-Willson W3.562291126279
8Lakes/Akbany-Little W3.562251533302
9RGAC/Lucas W3.553231739322
10McKinney/Hedblom W3.553251540334
11Lakes/Leeper-Bingham W3.553241641369
12Brook Hollow/Stephenson W3.544211943359
13El Dorado/Miller W3.544202044348
14Fretz/Buechel W3.544182249380
15Stonebridge/Giacchino-Cantu W3.544202050391
16Garland/Howarth-Grandle W3.535192146348
17High Point/Tucker-Wise-Itscovitch W3.535202048350
18High Point/Escutia W3.535182249370
19Bent Tree/Sarché-Wilder W3.535152552400
20Gleneagles/Steyn-Priebe W3.535162453400
21T bar M/Mizerany-Benson W3.535142657403
22DAC/Frazure-Shepardson W3.535122860409
23Royal Oaks/Copley W.526202043366
24Las Colinas/Demarque W3.526152553388
25McKinney/Griffiths-Sullivan W3.526132759407
26SpringPark/Eubank-Middlebrook W3.517103065420
27Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.508112961411
28Canyon Creek/Cotter-Allen W3.508112962436
29Lakewood/Cholerton-Tucker W3.50873368439

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Lindsey Widtfeldt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.52
Amy MacNicol
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
July Crockett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Helen Chang
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.37
Melissa Berg
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.13
Diane Carter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.11
Tatyana Borukhovich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
HUIHSIEN CHANG
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Jie Lin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Jennifer Paulson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.88
Erma Bryant
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.88
Laura Lembke
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.85
Amanda Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Allison Compton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Carolina Dusenbery
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Julie Stein
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Mary Beran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Raquel Harris
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsey Widtfeldt + Amy MacNicol16165% games+11.1% vs expected
HUIHSIEN CHANG + Jie Lin6657% games+4.9% vs expected
July Crockett + Melissa Berg3352% gamesnot enough data
Tatyana Borukhovich + Erma Bryant3251% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Paulson + Amanda Jackson1439% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Berg + Lindsey Widtfeldt314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Berg + Amy MacNicol224 matchesnot enough data
July Crockett + Lindsey Widtfeldt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsey Widtfeldt
28W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Amy MacNicol
22W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
July Crockett
25W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Helen Chang
30W–30L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Melissa Berg
17W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Diane Carter
5W–12L career · 9 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Tatyana Borukhovich
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
HUIHSIEN CHANG
12W–8L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Jie Lin
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Jennifer Paulson
13W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
3
Erma Bryant
28W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Laura Lembke
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
Amanda Jackson
10W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Allison Compton
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carolina Dusenbery
4W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Julie Stein
9W–19L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Beran
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raquel Harris
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.