Teams

OC Lifetime RSC - Chrissy

2025 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC 3.5W WD

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 SinglesNatalie Finn vs Kristiana Anderson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-13vs OC Marguerite MVTC - Caroline 1030Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalie Finn / Tania Reed vs Julia Keene / Laura Anderson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-30vs OC FW Mission Viejo CC - JannaLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Colson / Linda LaRue vs Beth Hoss / Jodie Hoffman6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Godlewski / Heather Donovan vs Janna Lewis / Holly Ferber6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCori Sperbeck / Chelsea van Niekerk vs Melissa Fenn / Janna Canzone6-3, 7-6
2025-05-23vs OC LNRC - KristieLost 01
L#1 SinglesNatalie Finn vs Teresa Zack4-6, 6-7
2025-05-09vs OC Newport Beach TC - Katya/KimmyWon 10
W#2 DoublesNatalie Finn / Cori Sperbeck vs Jodi Stone / Susan Wyman6-4, 6-4
2025-04-24vs OC Coto De Caza - TammyLost 01
L#1 SinglesNatalie Finn vs Rachel McPheron3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Chelsea van Niekerk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Tania Reed
published
3.46
Crosby Burke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Heather Donovan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Cori Sperbeck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Stephanie Colson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Linda LaRue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Natalie Finn
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
MeganMary Mills
published
3.10
Catherine Godlewski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Chrissy Bird
published 3.5
3.08
Elisa Seapy
published
3.01
Carolyn Soriano
published 3.5
2.75
Lois Russell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Kristin Georgi
published
Lauren Fracassi
published
Linda Richardi
published
Sam Gonzalez
published
Shari Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Donovan + Crosby Burke6165% games+4.9% vs expected
Linda Richardi + Shari Harris7064% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Soriano + Chrissy Bird123 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Soriano + Cori Sperbeck303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chelsea van Niekerk
36W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.64
Tania Reed
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Crosby Burke
22W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Heather Donovan
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Cori Sperbeck
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Stephanie Colson
41W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Linda LaRue
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
3.5
Natalie Finn
16W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
MeganMary Mills
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
3.5
Catherine Godlewski
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Chrissy Bird
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Elisa Seapy
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3.5
Carolyn Soriano
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Lois Russell
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Kristin Georgi
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Fracassi
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Richardi
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Gonzalez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shari Harris
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.