Teams

SPANISH TRAIL #1

2025 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER

15 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-06-19vs SPANISH TRAIL #2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Sheila Stetts vs Lena Grotz / Stephanie Tegano1-6, 2-6
2025-06-12vs SIENA SUMMERLINLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarisa Ptak / Pamela Rusk vs Marcela Urcia / Cynthia Whyte3-6, 3-6
2025-06-05vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Debra Johnson vs Rissa Broughton / Hong Lee2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Horns / Sheila Stetts vs Maria Gonzales / Kristi Reilly6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-05-29vs DRAGONRIDGE CCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Debbie Hicks / Joni Kerby1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDebra Johnson / Jane Casovan vs Lorry Mazzara / Cindi Ray1-6, 1-6
2025-05-22vs SUN CITY ANTHEM #2Won 10
W#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Bambi Montag / Kirsten Ingram3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-15vs SUN CITY ANTHEM #1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Debra Horns vs Nancy Stafford / Miyuki Baron5-7, 3-6
2025-05-08vs SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Amy Waters / Sabine Curtis4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPamela Rusk / Debra Johnson vs Erin Anderson / Patti Oakes3-6, 4-6
2025-04-17vs NV/FENN/ADULT55&OVER/W7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Holly Dexter / Amy Nhaisi2-6, 2-6
2025-04-10vs RED ROCK CC #2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Anne Kellogg / Donna Lefever6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-03vs SUN CITY SUMMERLINLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Debra Horns vs Blanca Avila / Terry Powers6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-27vs SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Carrie Whipple / Karen Miller3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Lyudmila Kotseva
published 3.5
3.08
Debra Horns
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.06
Pamela Rusk
usually #1 Doubles 92%, also #2 Doubles 8% · published 3.5
2.98
Marie Ramsey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.89
Cherry Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Marisa Ptak
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3
Patricia Boudier
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
Carla Kuhl
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.71
Sheila Stetts
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.70
Karolyn Willoughby
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.67
Peggy Latour
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.61
Deborah Graham
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.61
Dorothy Urban
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.58
Debra Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Jane Casovan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyudmila Kotseva + Pamela Rusk3347% games+7.9% vs expected
Patricia Boudier + Marisa Ptak141253% games+6.3% vs expected
Debra Horns + Lyudmila Kotseva3445% games+3.4% vs expected
Lyudmila Kotseva + Marisa Ptak2644% games+2.6% vs expected
Marie Ramsey + Marisa Ptak431259% games+2.4% vs expected
Dorothy Urban + Patricia Boudier91048% games+2.3% vs expected
Jane Casovan + Marisa Ptak21043% games+0.6% vs expected
Sheila Stetts + Pamela Rusk7949% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lyudmila Kotseva
41W–83L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Debra Horns
40W–72L career · 9 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Pamela Rusk
77W–134L career · 12 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Marie Ramsey
87W–120L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Cherry Marshall
101W–196L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Marisa Ptak
86W–92L career · 13 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Patricia Boudier
29W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carla Kuhl
71W–204L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Sheila Stetts
100W–207L career · 9 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Karolyn Willoughby
25W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Peggy Latour
71W–119L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
2.67
3
Deborah Graham
56W–153L career · 7 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Dorothy Urban
34W–57L career · 7 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
2.61
3
Debra Johnson
2W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.58
3
Jane Casovan
124W–184L career · 8 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.