Teams

Augustine 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 3.5 Women Singles Tues PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-18vs Adams 18 3.5W Singles Tues PMLost 01
L#3 SinglesWhitney Gansman vs Kathryn Fleihan6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKate Augustine vs Pam Fabros-Beuchat6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesFrannie Benfield vs Rosemarie Palazzolo6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesWhitney Gansman vs Suki Gutierrez3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMisty Hilliard vs Anna McGinnis3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAphton Lang vs Anita Allis4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-24vs Adams 18 3.5W Singles Tues PMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMisty Hilliard vs Stephanie Adams6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMichele Gustavsson vs Kathryn Fleihan1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKate Augustine vs Suki Gutierrez6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesAshley Vartanian vs Pam Fabros-Beuchat3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMichele Gustavsson vs Rosemarie Palazzolo0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMisty Hilliard vs Anita Allis3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAphton Lang vs Anna McGinnis6-7, 1-6
2025-06-03vs Adams 18 3.5W Singles Tues PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesKate Augustine vs Kathryn Fleihan6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMisty Hilliard vs Stacey Russo6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAshley Vartanian vs Kristina Zemaityte0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAshley Vartanian vs Rosemarie Palazzolo1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAphton Lang vs Suki Gutierrez6-3, 7-6
L#3 SinglesMichele Gustavsson vs Pam Fabros-Beuchat1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKate Augustine vs Gwen Peridot6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesFrannie Benfield vs Danielle Laliberte6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Singles Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Kate Augustine
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Aphton Lang
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Ashley Vartanian
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
3.08
Frannie Benfield
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.05
Shelly Tuhro
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.01
Misty Hilliard
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.85
Whitney Gansman
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.76
Michele Gustavsson
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Tuhro + Misty Hilliard4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Augustine
44W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Aphton Lang
23W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3
Ashley Vartanian
33W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Frannie Benfield
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Shelly Tuhro
47W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
Misty Hilliard
34W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Whitney Gansman
8W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Michele Gustavsson
14W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.