Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Ostrander/Leatham

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.18 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-05vs Wasatch Hills-BerceauWon 30
W#1 SinglesAthelia Graham vs Hannah Galbreath6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPaula Gause / Collette Renstrom vs Kassie Belcher / Jennifer Kawakami6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKarla Block / Katie Bingeman vs Megan Berceau / Katie Murphy7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesPaula Gause / Katie Bingeman vs Rebecca Harman / KayeLynn BASTIAN6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-22vs Sunpro-Gouff/MurrayWon 20
W#1 SinglesAthelia Graham vs Brittany Southam6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelanie Decker / Charlene Case vs Sue Ellen Vincent / Carolyn Woods6-3, 6-3
2024-07-15vs Salt Lake Tennis-BickmoreSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAthelia Graham vs Candy Friedli6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPaula Gause / Caryl Fletcher vs Jamie Sorensen / Wendy Conrad6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-08Won 21
W#1 SinglesAthelia Graham vs Lisa Packer6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPaula Gause / Caryl Fletcher vs Emily Matheson / Shawna Smart6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKarla Block / Charlene Case vs Krissie Summerhays / Katie Winson3-6, 2-6
2024-06-24vs Wasatch Hills-BerceauWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelanie Decker / Katie Bingeman vs Jennifer Sorensen / Brooke Iverson6-4, 6-0
2024-06-17Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCharlene Case / Caryl Fletcher vs KayeLynn BASTIAN / Rebecca Harman4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAthelia Graham vs Nooshin Prasthofer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatie Bingeman / Melanie Decker vs Delia Bayna / Jennifer Wily6-7, 4-6
2024-06-10vs Sunpro-Gouff/MurrayWon 20
W#2 DoublesPaula Gause / Collette Renstrom vs Karen Murray / Rebecca Waite6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Pettit / Charlene Case vs Sue Ellen Vincent / Jen White6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0W PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park Tennis-Ostrander/Leatham7123922207
2Sports Mall-Peterson/Summerhays44181436280
3Sunpro-Gouff/Murray35161643301

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Athelia Graham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.29
Betsy Ostrander
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Collette Renstrom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Nicole Leatham
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Diane Poole
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.90
Maria Pettit
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.88
Charlene Case
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Davinia Lyon
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.66
Caryl Fletcher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.48
Paula Gause
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Melanie Decker
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.40
Karla Block
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
Katie Bingeman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Leatham + Betsy Ostrander22961% games+8.0% vs expected
Nicole Leatham + Davinia Lyon10857% games+1.7% vs expected
Caryl Fletcher + Maria Pettit18854% games−0.5% vs expected
Karla Block + Nicole Leatham21139% games−6.3% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Davinia Lyon2439% games−7.0% vs expected
Karla Block + Caryl Fletcher0538% gamesnot enough data
Davinia Lyon + Paula Gause3261% gamesnot enough data
Karla Block + Maria Pettit314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Athelia Graham
58W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
3.5
Betsy Ostrander
88W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Collette Renstrom
60W–76L career · 8 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Nicole Leatham
108W–121L career · 8 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Diane Poole
191W–165L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Maria Pettit
188W–196L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Charlene Case
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Davinia Lyon
92W–68L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Caryl Fletcher
142W–122L career · 9 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Paula Gause
119W–77L career · 5 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
3
Melanie Decker
49W–170L career · 8 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.42
3
Karla Block
108W–230L career · type A · 7 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.40
Katie Bingeman
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.