Teams

SUN CITY ANTHEM

2024 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 6.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule18 played
2024-06-14vs SPANISH TRAIL #1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJoan Chevalier / Dixie Stephens vs Sheila Stetts / Deborah Davis6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnita Galloway / Mary Anne van Liere vs Deborah Graham / Carla Kuhl6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Ann Apone / Margaret Hicks vs Peggy Latour / Marisa Ptak1-6, 0-6
2024-06-13vs SPANISH TRAIL #1Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDeborah Rogers / Mary Ann Apone vs Deborah Graham / Marisa Ptak6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-06-07vs NV/LOWRY/ADULT55&OVER/W6.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJoan Chevalier / Fay Gallus vs Maria Lowry / Janelle Wells2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargaret Hicks / Ginger Nakamura vs Jill Morrison / Melissa Ruediger1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDixie Stephens / Mary Anne van Liere vs Susan Edwards / Jennifer Olson1-6, 2-6
2024-05-31vs SIENA SUMMERLINLost 12
L#1 DoublesFay Gallus / Dixie Stephens vs Nora Cook / Tori Rosenthal6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Apone / Margaret Hicks vs Orelle Gibson / Linda Fayne2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoan Chevalier / Anita Galloway vs Fiona Tiramani / Wimanus Hight0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-30vs SIENA SUMMERLINLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Ann Apone / Ruby Leong vs Orelle Gibson / Consuelo Kinahan4-6, 4-6
2024-05-23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Ann Apone / SHEILA GILLIS vs Luann Holmes / Stephanie Romney2-6, 3-6
2024-05-17vs SPANISH TRAIL #2Won 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Schwalbe / Mary Ann Apone vs Lynn Row / Mich LeRoy6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoan Chevalier / Anita Galloway vs Kathleen Richardson / Elizabeth Templeton6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMargaret Hicks / Ginger Nakamura vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-10vs DRAGONRIDGE CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDixie Stephens / Joan Chevalier vs Linda Hawkes / Stephanie Romney2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Galloway / Mary Anne van Liere vs Kristy Andrade / Kirsten Ingram2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Hicks / Mary Ann Apone vs Leslie Uelmen / Loretta Moses1-6, 2-6
2024-05-09vs SUN CITY SUMMERLINLost 01
L#2 DoublesJudy Winreb / Mary Ann Apone vs Judith Kraus / Sonya Hillman3-6, 0-6
2024-05-03vs DTC #1Won 30
W#1 DoublesDixie Stephens / Fay Gallus vs Maureen Kelly / Stephanie Lavigne6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Schwalbe / Margaret Hicks vs Nancy Peccole / Lucia Bubbins6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Anne van Liere / Anita Galloway vs Monica Taylor / Kimberly Cunningham6-4, 6-4
2024-04-28vs WHITNEY MESA PARKWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Anne van Liere / Joan Chevalier vs Diane Schopp / Merlee Vitug3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Apone / Anita Galloway vs Patricia Braganza / Deborah O'Connor6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDixie Stephens / Kelly Schwalbe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-25vs RED ROCK CCLost 01
L#2 DoublesPam Barrie / Mary Ann Apone vs Luanne Balelo / Kelley Oakley2-6, 2-6
2024-04-19vs SPANISH TRAIL #1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAnita Galloway / Mary Anne van Liere vs Deborah Davis / Sheila Stetts6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDixie Stephens / Joan Chevalier vs Patricia Boudier / Marisa Ptak6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFay Gallus / Margaret Hicks vs Peggy Latour / Karolyn Willoughby7-5, 6-1
2024-04-12vs NV/LOWRY/ADULT55&OVER/W6.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDixie Stephens / Fay Gallus vs Maria Lowry / Jill Morrison5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Anne van Liere / Anita Galloway vs Karen Wooldridge / Jennifer Olson5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Schwalbe / Margaret Hicks vs Janelle Wells / Moon-Hui Choi3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-09vs SIENA SUMMERLINWon 21
W#1 DoublesFay Gallus / Dixie Stephens vs Nora Cook / Tori Rosenthal6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoan Chevalier / Mary Anne van Liere vs Orelle Gibson / Linda Fayne6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKelly Schwalbe / Margaret Hicks vs Wimanus Hight / Consuelo Kinahan6-7, 2-6
2024-03-28vs NV/CASTELLI/ADULT55&OVER/ W7.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Ann Apone / Clairen Peeters vs Susan Castelli / Liwei Li2-6, 1-6
2024-03-22vs SPANISH TRAIL #2Won 30
W#1 DoublesMargaret Albert / Fay Gallus vs Trish Bradley-Garvin / Katrin Gajardo6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoan Chevalier / Dixie Stephens vs Barbie Quinn / Maureen Caruso6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKelly Schwalbe / Mary Anne van Liere vs Diane Sorrentino / Nancy Ozun6-1, 6-3
2024-03-21vs DRAGONRIDGE CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesFay Gallus / Margaret Albert vs Valerie Valow-Orris / Sally Morley6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGinger Nakamura / Margaret Hicks vs Stephanie Romney / Linda Hawkes6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Anne van Liere / Anita Galloway vs Natalie Gamberg / Kristy Andrade7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Ginger Nakamura
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.18
Fay Gallus
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
2.70
Joan Chevalier
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Dixie Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.58
Kelly Schwalbe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.44
Mary Ann Apone
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Anita Galloway
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jennifer Tiedemann
published
Margaret Albert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Hicks
published
Mary Anne van Liere
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dixie Stephens + Joan Chevalier233047% games+1.4% vs expected
Ginger Nakamura + Dixie Stephens9756% gamesnot enough data
Dixie Stephens + Fay Gallus8655% gamesnot enough data
Joan Chevalier + Fay Gallus7553% gamesnot enough data
Joan Chevalier + Kelly Schwalbe5354% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Nakamura + Joan Chevalier1643% gamesnot enough data
Mary Anne van Liere + Anita Galloway1545% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Nakamura + Fay Gallus4262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ginger Nakamura
76W–77L career · 11 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Fay Gallus
60W–42L career · 16 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Joan Chevalier
92W–124L career · 12 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Dixie Stephens
117W–151L career · 16 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Kelly Schwalbe
27W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.58
Mary Ann Apone
17W–42L career · 11 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Anita Galloway
9W–24L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Tiedemann
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Albert
96W–48L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Hicks
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Anne van Liere
28W–62L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.