Teams

WNCV Gibson (Aston Park)

Combo 40 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 40's Women 7.5 Combo - Wed

14 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-01vs WNCT Walker (Aston Park)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Kneier / Susanna Saidi vs Tracey Walker / Stephanie Upshaw2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCeleste Sandridge / Beth Meacham vs Eileen Cohen / Josie Thomas3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Moody / Danielle Andrews vs Amy Palmer / Elaine Dephouse6-1, 6-3
2025-09-24vs WNCA Elliot (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesVivian Gibson / Danielle Andrews vs Kelly Gillis / Sarah Corley3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Moody / Jennifer Edney vs Tina Kinard / Sherrie Voyles3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Kneier / Janet Sweezey vs Amy Gaston / Eva Hartman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-03vs WNCA Elliot (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDeborah James / Jennifer Edney vs Sherrie Voyles / Kelly McEnany4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Walker / Beth Meacham vs Sarah Cochran / Eva Hartman5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesVivian Gibson / Heidi Spradlin vs Tina Kinard / Susan Cook3-6, 3-6
2025-08-25vs WNCT Walker (Aston Park)Won 21
W#1 DoublesBeth Meacham / Susan Walker vs Elaine Dephouse / Anne Salter6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Moody / Danielle Andrews vs Jenny Hall / Jodi Shainberg6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlice Chen / Janet Sweezey vs Tracey Walker / Rebecca Carchman4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40's Women 7.5 Combo - Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Deborah James
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Susanna Saidi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Alexandra Moody
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Beth Meacham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Janet Sweezey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Vivian Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Tricia Reeks
published
3.36
Alexis Rosenfelt
published 3.5
3.34
Jennifer Edney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Alice Chen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Celeste Sandridge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Danielle Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Heidi Spradlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Kneier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Meacham + Vivian Gibson3644% games+3.2% vs expected
Janet Sweezey + Beth Meacham044 matchesnot enough data
Susanna Saidi + Beth Meacham224 matchesnot enough data
Susanna Saidi + Alexandra Moody134 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Reeks + Beth Meacham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deborah James
15W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susanna Saidi
19W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Alexandra Moody
21W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Beth Meacham
30W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Janet Sweezey
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Vivian Gibson
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Tricia Reeks
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Alexis Rosenfelt
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Jennifer Edney
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Alice Chen
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Celeste Sandridge
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Danielle Andrews
14W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Heidi Spradlin
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Kimberly Kneier
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.