Teams

Christie W

Tri-Level -Spring · Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.57 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-02vs Allie BWon 21
L#1 DoublesLucille Abe / Trena Rairdon vs Kima Kimura / Allison Erickson4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJessie Lief / Marlys Morton vs Nancy Scheetz-Freymiller / Conita Mullett6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesChristie Wyzykowski / Daniella DeLozier vs Barbara Jacobs / Allison Burand7-5, 6-3
2022-04-02vs CathyWon 30
W#1 DoublesLucille Abe / Marlys Morton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJessie Lief / Daniella DeLozier vs Julie Raymond-Yakoubian / Triin Minton7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristie Wyzykowski / Fledz Lastimoso vs Lori Kaltenbach / Song Bliss6-2, 6-1
2022-04-01vs RebeccaWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarlys Morton / Lucille Abe vs Nicolle Welch / Rebecca Kinworthy4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristie Wyzykowski / Jessie Lief vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDaniella DeLozier / Fledz Lastimoso vs Sandra Denton / Karen Loeffler6-0, 6-0
2022-03-27vs RebeccaWon 21
L#1 DoublesLucille Abe / Trena Rairdon vs Nicolle Welch / Rebecca Kinworthy3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJessie Lief / Marlys Morton vs Paige Thorne / Zareena Clendaniel6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCynthia Henie / Fledz Lastimoso vs Sandra Denton / Karen Savage6-2, 6-1
2022-03-26vs CathySplit 11
L#2 DoublesJessie Lief / Marlys Morton vs Stacia Green / Dana Griffin3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCynthia Henie / Christie Wyzykowski vs Susan Brunner / Julie Raymond-Yakoubian6-4, 6-2
2022-03-26vs Allie BWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarlys Morton / Lucille Abe vs Allison Erickson / Kima Kimura2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJessie Lief / Daniella DeLozier vs Conita Mullett / Jennifer Duclos6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChristie Wyzykowski / Cynthia Henie vs Barbara Jacobs / Bonnie Wickham6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Christie W5112613135
2Cathy4211717137
3Allie B1441123162
4Women Draft000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniella DeLozier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Trena Rairdon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Lucille Abe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Marlys Morton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Jessie Lief
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Cynthia Henie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Christie Wyzykowski
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Fledz Lastimoso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Wyzykowski + Cynthia Henie5261% games+5.1% vs expected
Daniella DeLozier + Jessie Lief12660% games+4.8% vs expected
Christie Wyzykowski + Jessie Lief213 matchesnot enough data
Lucille Abe + Daniella DeLozier213 matchesnot enough data
Lucille Abe + Marlys Morton123 matchesnot enough data
Jessie Lief + Marlys Morton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniella DeLozier
57W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Trena Rairdon
42W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Lucille Abe
66W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Marlys Morton
161W–112L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Jessie Lief
77W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Cynthia Henie
79W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Christie Wyzykowski
59W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
2.51
0
Fledz Lastimoso
30W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.