Teams

CDTA S A55W8.0 1Tam Corey Mon 7 $22

CDTA 1Summer Adult 55 & Over · CDTA 55 & over W 8.0 Summer

19 players · average NTRP 4.11 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesLaura Knapp / Heike Spahn vs Mary Etherington / Lisa Rosen3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Manolis / Huan Chang vs Kelly Carroll / Sheryl Albert1-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesNancy Cushing / Tracy Richards vs Carla Young / Masako Ueda7-6, 3-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeike Spahn / Anne Ryan vs Pamela Leichtling / Dawn Pollack6-4, 6-5
W#3 DoublesLing Arenson / Julie Weidner vs Lisa Lowenthal / Alja Hessami-Maas7-5, 4-3
W#1 DoublesHeike Spahn / Laura Knapp vs Caren Swickard / Lisa Hauser6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSoraya McTeague / Nancy Manolis vs Gail Harowski / Penny Heuer7-6, 3-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Rosenkrantz / Anne Ryan vs Julie Ladewig / Amy Peick2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Jill Siegel vs Donna Matkovic / Lara Phillips6-4, 0-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Daly / Silvia Kusaka vs Mya Murata / Keiko Okuda6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Manolis / Soraya McTeague vs Ann Wiet / Margo Carvell6-0, 6-4
W#1 DoublesNancy Cushing / Jennifer Langtry vs Priscilla Ewaldz / Rochelle Meng6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSoraya McTeague / Maria Lobo-Corey vs Julie Alexander / Susan Kalina6-1, 5-3
W#3 DoublesLing Arenson / Julie Weidner vs Christina Greeley / Cara Waddle7-6, 2-1
W#1 DoublesNancy Cushing / Tracy Richards vs Renee Buxton / Terri Whiting1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Manolis / Soraya McTeague vs Terra Jahns / Lori Raffone4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHuan Chang / Rebecca Daly vs Patrice Duffy / Lici Lytle7-5, 4-3
W#1 DoublesNancy Cushing / Tracy Richards vs Mari Cantorna / Kelly Tenuta6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Langtry / Silvia Kusaka vs Karin Carney / Catherine Wasylenko6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJill Siegel / Laura Knapp vs Katherine Bianchi / Dorothy OMalley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · CDTA 55 & over W 8.0 Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A55W8.0 1Tam Corey Mon 7 $226114716163
2CDTA S A55W8.0 5Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $225216515146
3CDTA S A55W8.0 8Park Forest Harowski Mon 7 $185214718147
4CDTA S A55W8.0 3Schaumburg Pirron Mon 7 $225214718178
5CDTA S A55W8.0 7Centre Court Karpinski Sun 10 $223491226187
6CDTA S A55W8.0 6MT Bann (OUT) Kalina Wed 6:30 $273481329197
7CDTA S A55W8.0 2Nielsen Ueda Sun 1 $221651633202
8CDTA S A55W8.0 4Naperville Bianchi Wed 7 $240741737226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Jennifer Langtry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Heike Spahn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Christine Rosenkrantz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Jill Siegel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.99
Soraya McTeague
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.98
Huan Chang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Nancy Cushing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Tracy Richards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Silvia Kusaka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Laura Purcell
published
3.61
Kate Newman
published
3.61
Julie Weidner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Ling Arenson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Nancy Manolis
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.52
Rebecca Daly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Maria Lobo-Corey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Anne Ryan
published 3.5
Laura Knapp
published
Patricia Nick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Richards + Jennifer Langtry5260% games+15.6% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Jill Siegel4366% games+13.9% vs expected
Silvia Kusaka + Julie Weidner11260% games+7.5% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Nancy Manolis9360% games+4.5% vs expected
Silvia Kusaka + Jennifer Langtry14663% games+3.7% vs expected
Ling Arenson + Julie Weidner12851% games+3.5% vs expected
Tracy Richards + Nancy Cushing461459% games+1.8% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Julie Weidner193049% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jennifer Langtry
244W–109L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Heike Spahn
161W–144L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.12
4.5
Christine Rosenkrantz
26W–20L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
Jill Siegel
70W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Soraya McTeague
162W–103L career · 4 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
Huan Chang
178W–130L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Nancy Cushing
212W–107L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
Tracy Richards
113W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Silvia Kusaka
232W–160L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Laura Purcell
152W–152L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Kate Newman
39W–44L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Julie Weidner
146W–137L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Ling Arenson
54W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Nancy Manolis
114W–130L career · 7 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Rebecca Daly
121W–136L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
265W–225L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Anne Ryan
22W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Knapp
55W–46L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Nick
37W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.