Teams

Sterling Oaks - B. Beard

2023 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-08vs COLLIER/ Shields/Combo50&over7.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnne Mortillaro / Tasha Christiansen vs Brenda Shields / Karey Hogan6-7, 6-7
2023-04-17vs Pelican Bay North - L. AllenWon 10
W#1 DoublesTammy Finlinson / Anne Mortillaro vs Peggy Strakosch / Judi Howard6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-10vs Treviso Bay - LevineLost 01
L#1 DoublesTasha Christiansen / Anne Mortillaro vs Mary Ann Benzing / Hildy Glick2-6, 2-6
2023-04-03vs Verona Walk - HaedeltLost 01
L#1 DoublesTammy Finlinson / Flavia Jorge vs Samantha Almy / Linda Keely6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-20vs Players Club - WautersWon 10
W#1 DoublesTammy Finlinson / Flavia Jorge vs Crystie Ciriello / Susan Dow6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Tammy Finlinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Lindsay Ennis
published
3.57
Barbara Beard
published 4
3.43
Anne Mortillaro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.27
Flavia Jorge
published 3.5
3.22
Amy McHale
published 3.5
3.12
Lisa Sanderson
published
Glenna Haas
published 3
Jennifer Heimmel
published
Kelly Beam
published
Lani Wheeler
published
Tina Doria
published
Trudy Searle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Doria + Amy McHale213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tammy Finlinson
61W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
4.00
Lindsay Ennis
53W–51L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Barbara Beard
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Anne Mortillaro
36W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Flavia Jorge
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amy McHale
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Lisa Sanderson
14W–41L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Glenna Haas
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Heimmel
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Beam
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lani Wheeler
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Doria
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Trudy Searle
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.