2PEACH-GAINES MIX18&O 70 SEM F4
2023 SEM MIX SUMMER 18 & OVER · 7.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER
19 players · average NTRP 3.46 / S.E. MICHIGAN
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule9 played
i
Flight standings25 teams · 7.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13LIB-MARLEY MIX18&O 70 SEM F2 | 9 | 0 | 13 | 163 |
| 24LIB-KORNFELD MIX18&O 70 SEM F3 | 8 | 1 | 11 | 145 |
| 34SCWB-OUTSIDE-MOSS MIX18&O 70 SEM F1 | 7 | 1 | 16 | 177 |
| 44FAC-YU MIX18&O 70 SEM F5 | 7 | 2 | 17 | 173 |
| 53VTC-inside-CROUSON MIX18&O 70 SEM F3 | 7 | 2 | 20 | 210 |
| 61PEACH-DEGUZMAN MIX18&O 70 SEM F4 | 7 | 2 | 27 | 215 |
| 72SCWB-GAY MIX18&O 70 SEM F6 | 6 | 2 | 18 | 178 |
| 82LIFE-ANDERSON MIX18&O 70 SEM F5 | 6 | 3 | 23 | 208 |
| 93BOH-VONDELL MIX18&O 70 SEM F1 | 5 | 3 | 20 | 200 |
| 101FAC-PASSMORE MIX18&O 70 SEM F6 | 5 | 3 | 24 | 211 |
| 111LIB-STPIERRE MIX18&O 70 SEM F2 | 5 | 4 | 28 | 249 |
| 121WESS-ZUGER MIX18&O 70 SEM F5 | 5 | 4 | 28 | 240 |
| 134EAST-ZAMPARDO MIX18&O 70 SEM F4 | 4 | 5 | 31 | 241 |
| 142HV-CLARKE MIX18&O 70 SEM F2 | 4 | 5 | 33 | 253 |
| 152PEACH-GAINES MIX18&O 70 SEM F4 | 4 | 5 | 33 | 263 |
| 162TROY-LI MIX18&O 70 SEM F1 | 3 | 5 | 28 | 204 |
| 173FAC-ROSS MIX18&O 70 SEM F6 | 3 | 5 | 29 | 236 |
| 186RO-MARTINI MIX18&O 70 SEM F1 | 3 | 5 | 32 | 229 |
| 193PH-EVENSON MIX18&O 70 SEM F4 | 3 | 6 | 34 | 254 |
| 201TROY-LITWIN MIX18&O 70 SEM F1 | 2 | 6 | 37 | 242 |
| 211HV-KING MIX18&O 70 SEM F3 | 2 | 7 | 37 | 253 |
| 224NAC-ZEBARI MIX18&O 70 SEM F6 | 1 | 5 | 33 | 210 |
| 232LIB-OBRIEN MIX18&O 70 SEM F3 | 1 | 8 | 49 | 312 |
| 244HV-COFFEY MIX18&O 70 SEM F2 | 0 | 9 | 46 | 293 |
| 253BEV-ZADROGA MIX18&O 70 SEM F5 | 0 | 9 | 54 | 323 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Lisa Studzinski + JUSTIN WHITE | 5–4 | 49% games | +0.7% vs expected |
| Joanne Gaines + Eric Wheatley | 4–4 | 44% games | −2.2% vs expected |
| Christine Nathman-Parisi + Jason Meesseman | 9–4 | 54% games | −3.9% vs expected |
| Edin Trsic + Ana Trsic | 7–9 | 47% games | −13.1% vs expected |
| Joanne Gaines + Jason Meesseman | 4–5 | 49% games | not enough data |
| Heidi Maglicic + Timothy Prevost | 0–8 | 27% games | not enough data |
| Eric Wheatley + Lisa Studzinski | 1–5 | 40% games | not enough data |
| Jason Meesseman + Elizabeth Mazurco | 3–3 | 53% games | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.