Teams

MAC Staton

2023 Richmond Flexible Format Women · Richmond Flexible Format Women 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-15vs Bon Air FenstermacherWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesStacey Cabral / Rocio Lopez vs Shelli Fenstermacher / Melanie Agee-Wade6-0, 6-1
2023-05-08vs WOCC KniermWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesStacey Cabral / Rocio Lopez vs Zinie Sampson / Kristin Hamlin6-4, 6-3
2023-05-01vs Magnolia Green WintersWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesStacey Cabral / Rocio Lopez vs Molly Palenski / Dana Chenevert6-0, 6-0
W#2 Female DoublesAnne Wolff / Susan Staton vs Natalie Winters / Keri Biggins3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-04-17vs HCC Lines 6.0Split 11
W#1 Female DoublesStacey Cabral / Rocio Lopez vs Lauren Hutcheson / Vanessa Dambrosia6-4, 6-0
L#2 Female DoublesSusan Staton / Lisa Johnson vs Jennifer McGeorge / Thu-Hang Groome6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Flexible Format Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Stacey Cabral
usually #1 Female Doubles 57%, also #2 Female Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.87
Anne Wolff
published 3
2.78
Susan Staton
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Sue Mathe
published
2.77
2.77
Chitra Chavan
published 3
2.65
Ruth Bates
published
2.43
Melinda Staples
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Staton + Anne Wolff3450% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stacey Cabral
217W–103L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3
Anne Wolff
23W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
Susan Staton
130W–142L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
2.78
Sue Mathe
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Clarissa McDonough
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Chitra Chavan
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Ruth Bates
7W–21L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
Melinda Staples
17W–21L career · no lines in 2023
0%69%31%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.