Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Wolfgram/Winson

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W AM

21 players · average NTRP 3.27 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKatie Winson / Caryl Fletcher vs Camille Weaver / Lisa Beames0-6, 3-6
2023-07-26vs Liberty Park Tennis-SwalbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelley Allred / Caryl Fletcher vs Paulette Bierwolf / Annette Ludlow6-3, 6-4
2023-07-19vs Park City MARC-Byrne/KruegerWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatie Winson / Caryl Fletcher vs Kelly Krueger / Kathleen DiCesaris6-0, 6-3
2023-06-23vs Salt Lake Tennis-Bickmore/DansieLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaria Pettit / Paula Naatz vs Rebecca Anderson / Liz Bell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesCaryl Fletcher / Jennifer Tooley vs Robin Asmar / Alison Parsons6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Yoko Walljasper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.19
Inga Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.17
Sarah Law
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
3.12
Lindy Parks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Diane Poole
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.00
Sarah Yates
published
2.93
Katie Winson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
2.90
Maria Pettit
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.89
Kadee Wolfgram
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Kelley Allred
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Krissie Summerhays
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Carrie Larsen
published 3
2.66
Caryl Fletcher
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Kelly Lund
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Magdalena Kovacsovics
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Nicole Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nooshin Prasthofer
published
Paula Naatz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sherrie Hatch
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Tracee Kemp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caryl Fletcher + Paula Naatz4262% games+12.2% vs expected
Sarah Law + Maria Pettit5064% games+8.8% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Sherrie Hatch6357% games+7.4% vs expected
Tracee Kemp + Kelley Allred5259% games+7.3% vs expected
Inga Nelson + Yoko Walljasper12261% games+7.2% vs expected
Nicole Fisher + Maria Pettit5160% games+4.6% vs expected
Sarah Yates + Caryl Fletcher4254% games+3.7% vs expected
Sarah Law + Yoko Walljasper2644% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Yoko Walljasper
308W–196L career · 10 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
198W–228L career · 14 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Inga Nelson
162W–124L career · 7 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
Sarah Law
85W–85L career · 11 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Lindy Parks
121W–91L career · 8 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Diane Poole
191W–165L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
Sarah Yates
55W–39L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.00
3.5
Katie Winson
128W–124L career · 7 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Maria Pettit
188W–196L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3.5
Kadee Wolfgram
97W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.89
Kelley Allred
71W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Krissie Summerhays
110W–123L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Carrie Larsen
38W–39L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Caryl Fletcher
142W–122L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
2.66
Kelly Lund
39W–39L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Magdalena Kovacsovics
51W–86L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Fisher
102W–64L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nooshin Prasthofer
97W–124L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula Naatz
58W–84L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Sherrie Hatch
74W–76L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracee Kemp
39W–100L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.