Teams

Pitts 18 Tri 3.5/3.0/2.5W Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesBritt Flanagan / Emily Wilson vs Kelly Cope / Mandi Clift7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLaJean Morrow Smith / Sarah Schott vs Kelly Glick / Andrea Thomas4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSara Adamson / Sloane McPeak vs Diane Puckett / Jennifer Russell6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSydney Harris / Kiersten Garland vs Jenifer Checo / Heather McMahon7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTiana Pitts / Kimberley Cathey vs Caroline Wilson / Rachel Hutto6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Johnstone / Clara Gonzalez Flores vs Rebecca McNeill / Mary Mullens6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesBritt Flanagan / Emily Wilson vs Katie Hu / Kathryn Fleihan6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesLaJean Morrow Smith / Sarah Schott vs Mandi Clift / Kelly Cope2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Dagger / Sara Adamson vs Nancy Stoddard / Kate Maffeo6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesClara Gonzalez Flores / Shannon Smith vs Brittney Obrien / Brooke Williams6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesLaJean Morrow Smith / Britt Flanagan vs Julie McPherson / Kelly Glick5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberley Cathey / Sara Adamson vs Jennifer Klein / Diane Puckett6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Johnstone / Shannon Smith vs Heather McMahon / Julie Mcgehee6-3, 6-2
2025-06-02vs Tucker 18+ Tri 3.5/3.0/2.5W Mon PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Winstead / Sarah Schott vs Brooke Tsuei / silvina piotti0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSara Adamson / Sloane McPeak vs Michele Gustavsson / Kate Augustine3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesClara Gonzalez Flores / Kiersten Garland vs Judy Tsuei / Julia Saguier2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesTiana Pitts / LaJean Morrow Smith vs Katie Hu / Kathryn Fleihan5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKimberley Cathey / Courtney Dagger vs Donna Burick / Sammie Jo McCluskey6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSydney Harris / Clara Gonzalez Flores vs Shelly Penumalli / Erin Wallace2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Tiana Pitts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Britt Flanagan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Sara Adamson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.20
Sloane McPeak
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
LaJean Morrow Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Emily Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Sarah Schott
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.04
Mary Winstead
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Clara Gonzalez Flores
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Courtney Dagger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Catherine Johnstone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Kiersten Garland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Kimberley Cathey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Dagger + LaJean Morrow Smith3350% gamesnot enough data
Courtney Dagger + Tiana Pitts404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiana Pitts
38W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Sara Adamson
25W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
Sloane McPeak
34W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.20
LaJean Morrow Smith
11W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Emily Wilson
179W–124L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Sarah Schott
3W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.09
Mary Winstead
16W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Clara Gonzalez Flores
43W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Courtney Dagger
37W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Catherine Johnstone
34W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Kiersten Garland
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.83
Kimberley Cathey
23W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.