Teams

Liberty Park-Wolfgram/Winson

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.0W AM

26 players · average NTRP 3.27 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-24vs Ace Athletics-SwalbergLost 01
L#2 SinglesKelley Allred vs Haley Swan1-6, 0-6
2023-05-23vs Red Ledges-Overton/WoodSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDiane Poole / Caryl Fletcher vs Stefanie Maddox / Megan Overton6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Pearce / Sarah Yates vs Dawn Jones / Giuliana Willis1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-17vs Sunpro-Belliston/AndersonLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaryl Fletcher / Nooshin Prasthofer vs Raquel Moss / Cherylin Winkel3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKelley Allred vs Jill Marsh1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLindy Parks / Sarah Yates vs Christine Gouff / Laura Wills-Mitchell6-4, 6-0
2023-05-03vs Ogden-Cox/JohnstunWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Yates / Anna Pearce vs Pilar Olsen / Kelti Palmer2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-19vs Ace Athletics-SwalbergWon 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Whittaker / Kelley Allred vs Paulette Bierwolf / Annette Ludlow6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0W AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park-Wolfgram/Winson62251537292
2South Jordan-Farnsworth/Ricker26132758398

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Mithona Nielsen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.30
Haley H Moreno
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
Anna Palmer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Jessica Whittaker
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.17
Sarah Law
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Alycia Anthony
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.14
Lindy Parks
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Diane Poole
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.98
Sarah Yates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Katie Winson
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
2.92
Kadee Wolfgram
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.88
Melissa Child
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.85
Maria Pettit
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.85
Kelley Allred
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Krissie Summerhays
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
Carrie Larsen
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Mikelle Moore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Anna Pearce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Caryl Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kelly Lund
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Magdalena Kovacsovics
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nicole Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Nooshin Prasthofer
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
Paula Naatz
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Tracee Kemp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Magdalena Kovacsovics + Nicole Fisher5163% games+12.9% vs expected
Caryl Fletcher + Paula Naatz4262% games+12.6% vs expected
Melissa Child + Haley H Moreno7066% games+11.5% vs expected
Mithona Nielsen + Nicole Fisher3256% games+10.4% vs expected
Sarah Law + Maria Pettit5064% games+9.0% vs expected
Tracee Kemp + Kelley Allred5259% games+6.5% vs expected
Katie Winson + Kelley Allred12556% games+5.5% vs expected
Nicole Fisher + Maria Pettit5160% games+5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mithona Nielsen
112W–116L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.70
Haley H Moreno
82W–46L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Anna Palmer
10W–19L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
197W–228L career · 18 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Jessica Whittaker
87W–79L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.19
Sarah Law
82W–85L career · 9 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Alycia Anthony
71W–35L career · 10 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Lindy Parks
120W–90L career · 5 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Diane Poole
191W–163L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
Sarah Yates
55W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Katie Winson
128W–122L career · 6 lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94
3.5
Kadee Wolfgram
97W–84L career · 6 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Melissa Child
73W–73L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Maria Pettit
187W–196L career · 14 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Kelley Allred
71W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Krissie Summerhays
109W–122L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Carrie Larsen
49W–46L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Mikelle Moore
46W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Anna Pearce
53W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Caryl Fletcher
141W–122L career · 2 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57
Kelly Lund
37W–37L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Magdalena Kovacsovics
50W–82L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Fisher
100W–62L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nooshin Prasthofer
98W–124L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula Naatz
57W–82L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracee Kemp
38W–101L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.