Search

Michelle Fladebo

GIG HARBOR, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
70 matches · 45W–25L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.08
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
17%
down to 4.0
83%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 11% down · 89% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.10. Higher than today’s 4.08 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.5
198 of 364

Michelle is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michelle has been 4.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.520192020202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Michelle has gone from the 86th to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
53.6%
15W–13L · 49.9% of games
8.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 59.6% of games
9.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 71.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history70 matches
W
Sue Duncan / Sherri Luellchamps
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Andrea Lipper
0.004about as expected — took 55% of games against 56% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Andrea Lipper
0.015about as expected — took 52% of games against 57% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-16 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sachiko Ishihara-Spray
+0.017better than expected — took 68% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Wyatt
+0.014better than expected — took 92% of games against 73% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Renee Peterson
0.022about as expected — took 71% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Wyatt
0.056below expectation — took 32% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrea Lipper
0.022about as expected — took 80% of games against 78% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-09-28 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrea Lipper
0.031about as expected — took 75% of games against 77% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Andrea Lipper
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Andrea Lipper
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Andrea Lipper
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-3
L
Sarah Footh / Alicia Colechamps
2024-12-15 · #1 Doubles · with Diana Chan
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.