← Search

Andrea Lipper

LACEY, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
87 matches · 60W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.14
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 4.0
96%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.5
133 of 364

Andrea is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrea has been 4.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

4.04.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Andrea has gone from the 48th to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
63.2%
24W–14L · 53.3% of games
8.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 65.6% of games
9.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 72.1% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history87 matches
W
Sue Duncan / Sherri Luellchamps
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Michelle Fladebo
−0.004about as expected — took 55% of games against 56% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Fladebo
−0.015about as expected — took 52% of games against 57% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathi McKay
−0.019below expectation — took 52% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Colleen Sharkey
−0.001better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathi McKay
+0.011about as expected — took 56% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-10-19 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sachiko Ishihara-Spray
+0.036better than expected — took 92% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathi McKay
+0.015better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-05 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Guptill
−0.024about as expected — took 80% of games against 78% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michelle Fladebo
−0.022about as expected — took 80% of games against 78% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-09-28 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michelle Fladebo
−0.031about as expected — took 75% of games against 77% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Michelle Fladebo
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Michelle Fladebo
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.