← Search

Tim Bernardez

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 25W–20L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history45 matches
W
2026-10-30 · BC-Glass · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregory Chin
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-09-26 · MI-Matthews · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ronald Beresky
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-20 · BC-Glass · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregory Chin
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · BC-Glass · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregory Chin
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-28 · NWW-MI-Matthews · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Bay
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-02 · NWW-MI-Matthews · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Bay
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2024-10-19 · NWW-MI-Matthews · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregory Skaggs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-09-15 · NWW-STC-Slade · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Slade
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-23 · NWW-STC-Slade · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vincent La Cava championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-23 · NWW-MI-Matthews · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Matthews championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-25 · MI-Goodman 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mayoor Tandon
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-19 · MI-Goodman 4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mayoor Tandon
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.9% of games
8.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 53.5% of games
9.0
30%
3W–7L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
8 matches
Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe