Search

Rachel Hardecke

CLINTON, WA
0.0 year-end
52 matches · 25W–27L · seasons 20192023
Where Rachel sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Rachel is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rachel has been a steady 4.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Rachel has gone from the 44th to the 13th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 66.1% of games
4.5
37.9%
11W–18L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
L
Silvia Cortes / Kaila Yun
2023-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Lindberg
+0.018about as expected — took 40% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2023-01-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Krystal Garfield
+0.011about as expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-08-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cheryl Farnham
0.021below expectation — took 8% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2022-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kari Kuipers
+0.013better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2022-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Debiec
+0.050better than expected — took 50% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Candace Hines
+0.003below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Debiec
0.043below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Aileen Nguyen / Julie Hansen
2022-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Debiec
0.052below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2022-03-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathleen McNamee
0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2022-02-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Johnson
+0.002about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-01-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Johnson
+0.081better than expected — took 71% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2021-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gini Bouche
0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.