← Search

Kent Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lewiston, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 8W–15L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history23 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Palouse-Higgins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Strobel
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-25 · Palouse-Higgins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Strobel
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-24 · Palouse-Higgins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Strobel
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-10-23 · Palouse-Higgins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Munyaka
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-26 · Palouse-Higgins · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Strobel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-10-25 · Palouse-Higgins · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Danny Mullins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-25 · Palouse-Higgins · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Strobel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-24 · Palouse-Higgins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Higgins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-24 · Palouse-Higgins · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alan Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2020-11-08 · 7.5 Mixed Combo Gimbel-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Renee Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2020-10-18 · 7.5 Mixed Combo Gimbel-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Larson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2020-10-18 · 7.5 Mixed Combo Gimbel-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shiho Gimbel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 42.3% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 36.1% of games
8.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 28.8% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#2 Singles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams