← Search

Daniel Higgins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Juliaetta, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 19W–16L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history35 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Palouse-Higgins · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Munyaka
loading the estimate
6-7
L
2026-10-25 · Palouse-Higgins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Munyaka
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-24 · Palouse-Higgins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jorge Pacheco
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-23 · Palouse-Higgins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jorge Pacheco
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-10-26 · Palouse-Higgins · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Strobel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-10-26 · Palouse-Higgins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Cattell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-25 · Palouse-Higgins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Cattell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · Palouse-Higgins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jorge Pacheco
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-24 · Palouse-Higgins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kent Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-24 · Palouse-Higgins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Danny Mullins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-22 · EW-PTC-Anegon · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anthony Anegon championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-21 · EW-PTC-Anegon · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alan Johnson championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.6% of games
8.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
7 matches
Singles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer