← Search

Kim Schunk

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
83 matches · 33W–50L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Kim sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Kim is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kim has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Kim has gone from the 32nd to the 36th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
39.7%
31W–47L · 45.4% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
L
2022-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luanne Balelo
+0.041better than expected — took 50% of games against 34% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2022-10-26 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Winston
+0.013better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
N/A
2022-05-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Oakley
+0.041better than expected — took 100% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Mimi Liu / Laura Grob
2022-04-13 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Higgins
−0.001below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2022-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Harvey
+0.009below expectation — took 8% of games against 19% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2022-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amalia Dominguez
−0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-03-23 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amalia Dominguez
+0.010better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2022-03-16 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Geinzer
−0.055below expectation — took 40% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2022-03-09 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Little
+0.035better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2022-02-16 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Oakley
+0.008about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-02-02 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Higgins
−0.033below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Carla Eggleston / Teryn Mendenhall
2022-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Consuelo Kinahan
+0.031better than expected — took 47% of games against 35% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.