← Search

Carmen Miller Branch

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2024
124 matches · 49W–75L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Carmen sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Carmen is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Carmen has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Carmen has gone from the 6th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.5
50%
34W–34L · 49.3% of games
4.0
33.3%
7W–14L · 41.1% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 46.7% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0%
0W–7L · 34.9% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 30.3% of games
7.5mixed
40%
4W–6L · 41% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history124 matches
L
2024-11-04 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shani Ma
−0.024below expectation — took 38% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Cynthia Graham / Shani Ma
2024-10-31 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Fair
+0.021better than expected — took 44% of games against 37% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-10-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shani Ma
+0.024better than expected — took 63% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Elizabeth McManus / Joanna Banks
2024-10-24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacqueline Smallwood
+0.023better than expected — took 39% of games against 33% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-10-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniela Frustockl
−0.044below expectation — took 35% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2024-09-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniela Frustockl
−0.022below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Karen Miller / Joanna Banks
2024-09-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniela Frustockl
+0.022better than expected — took 68% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2024-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan DeVito
−0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Kelly Maier / Kathryn Garlan
2024-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shani Ma
+0.031better than expected — took 54% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Fair
−0.019below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridgette Oconnor
−0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Nancy Drabicki / Jill Russell
2024-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Fair
+0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.