← Search

Leea McPhearson

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2023
181 matches · 77W–104L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Leea sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Leea is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Leea has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Leea has gone from the 75th to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
58.2%
53W–38L · 52.9% of games
4.0
13.9%
5W–31L · 33.9% of games
6.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.6% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 43.9% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 33.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history181 matches
L
Ana Novicic / Wendy Jacobs
2023-12-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirsten Ingram
+0.053better than expected — took 37% of games against 22% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2023-11-20 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirsten Ingram
+0.011about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Kerry Varwig / Tanya Syme
2023-10-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Thornhill
+0.058better than expected — took 65% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Maria Berkovits / Cynthia Turner
2023-10-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Thornhill
−0.002below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Kathy Ford / Margaret Argier
2023-09-11 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Jones
−0.003below expectation — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-05-06 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.019better than expected — took 68% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Jason MacDonald / Elisabeth Skinnermixed
2023-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ricky Riopta
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Lisa Ross / Karen Miller
2023-04-10 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather George
−0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Cynthia Whyte / Jennifer Olson
2023-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Ingram
−0.020below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2023-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ricky Riopta
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 47% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Susan Gray / Sabine Curtis
2023-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Delgado
−0.038below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Edward Stephens / Carol Rappmixed
2023-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ricky Riopta
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.